This was a set-up thread, to give some credulity to barry the bastard’s illicit status. Look at what hit the thread immediately upon it being posted. An instant reference to the obamanoid, Captain Kirk, thread which floats the big lie, so the thread started with two layers already stilted to defend the bassturd’s ineligibility. As the 2012 relection cycle heats up, expect more and more of these vermin to come slithering out of the woodwork.
Yeah, it certianly looks like a set-up thread for the goofy after-Birther.
Since this is all regurgitation, here what was said to Captain Duncel:
- - - - - -- - - - - - -
To: Captain Kirk; iowamark; WhiskeyX
Here's some...here you go:
- - - - -- - - - - - -
Possible 2012 Republican Presidential Candidates: Part 3 (Jindal/Barbour/Christie)
[Quote]
1910 Census: I haven’t found a Theodore Agnew in 1910, but I did find a “Theodoros Anagnostopoulos” (his original name) in Massachusetts who’s the right age. He’s listed as “Alien.”
Source Citation: Year: 1910; Census Place: New Bedford Ward 6, Bristol, Massachusetts; Roll: T624_579; Page: 4B; Enumeration District: 211; Image: 689.
[Unquote]
You are reporting the wrong census record and the wrong person. He is not the father of Spiro Theodore Agnew.
He is listed under a different name in another state and city. the 1910 U.S. Census reports he is “Na”, a naturalized U.S. citizen.
The 1930 U.S. Census reports he is “Na”, a naturalized U.S. citizen, but someone used a pencil to cross out the “Na” and write “Al”, meaning an Alien, in pencil above the “Na” written in ink. This was also done for some reason to other “Na” entries made by this census taker as well for reasons that are unknown.
The original entry for the 1910 U.S. Census very definitely reports he was a naturalized U.S. citizen eight years before the birth of his son. The draft registration reports he was a naturalized U.S. citizen no less than two months before the birth of his son. The 1920 U.S. Census record reports him as “Al” and Alien, but there are so many gross errors about age, year of immigration, the informant obviously was reporting erroneous information to the census taker. The 1930 U.S. Census reported he was a naturalized U.S. citizen, except the pen and ink entry was altered by pencil to report an Alien instead of naturalized U.S. citizen.
The natural born citizen requirement only matters to people who believe in enforcing the articles of the Constitution without bias and favortism to any party or person. Everyone else is acting in contempt of the Constitution and the principles for which it stands. It remains to be seen who will protect and defend the Constitution and who will effectively destroy the Constitution and the principles of freedom it was created to defend.
Now you are trying to take the comment out of context and twist it into something it was never meant to be in the first place. His immigration record demonstrated the 1920 Census record and informant were in gross error and thereby supported the census records, draft registrations, and other records which reported him to be a naturalized citizen at least by 12 September 1918. The overwhelming preponderance of the evidence seen to date, everything other than some informant’s error ridden 1920 U.S. Census entry, reports Theodore Spiro Agnew was a naturalized U.S. citizen before the birth of his son. You have been given the exact citation where you can see the report of his U.S. citizenship in the draft registration for yourself. If you want to attempt to rebut the record of the man’s U.S. citizenship in those records, you are certainly free to find the persuasive documentary records needed to do so.
Theodore Spiro Agnew; born Sept. 12, 1878, U.S. Citizen, [checked] Naturalized....
Theodore Spiro Agnew, [date of rrecord] 12 September 1918, Draft Board 11, Baltimore City, Maryland, World War I Draft Registration Cards, 1917-1918. United States, Selective Service System. World War I Selective Service System Draft Registration Cards, 1917-1918. Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration. M1509, 4,582 rolls.
- - - - - - - - - -