Now you are trying to take the comment out of context and twist it into something it was never meant to be in the first place. His immigration record demonstrated the 1920 Census record and informant were in gross error and thereby supported the census records, draft registrations, and other records which reported him to be a naturalized citizen at least by 12 September 1918. The overwhelming preponderance of the evidence seen to date, everything other than some informant’s error ridden 1920 U.S. Census entry, reports Theodore Spiro Agnew was a naturalized U.S. citizen before the birth of his son. You have been given the exact citation where you can see the report of his U.S. citizenship in the draft registration for yourself. If you want to attempt to rebut the record of the man’s U.S. citizenship in those records, you are certainly free to find the persuasive documentary records needed to do so.
You've identified the WWI draft card. The same one I identified in my post above. But you claim that "census records" (plural) "draft registrations" (plural) "and other records" (plural) evidence this same conclusion. So what are these multiple other documents you claim exist?
I've pointed out that the 1910 and 1930 Censuses don't show him as being naturalized, despite your claim to the contrary. I've already provided the source locations, but I'll provide images of those two pages if you like.
And you have a funny definition of "overwhelming preponderance." Since 'not naturalized' currently has three Census records in its favor, and 'naturalized' has one draft card.