Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LorenC

[Quote]
1910 Census: I haven’t found a Theodore Agnew in 1910, but I did find a “Theodoros Anagnostopoulos” (his original name) in Massachusetts who’s the right age. He’s listed as “Alien.”

Source Citation: Year: 1910; Census Place: New Bedford Ward 6, Bristol, Massachusetts; Roll: T624_579; Page: 4B; Enumeration District: 211; Image: 689.
[Unquote]

You are reporting the wrong census record and the wrong person. He is not the father of Spiro Theodore Agnew.

He is listed under a different name in another state and city. the 1910 U.S. Census reports he is “Na”, a naturalized U.S. citizen.

The 1930 U.S. Census reports he is “Na”, a naturalized U.S. citizen, but someone used a pencil to cross out the “Na” and write “Al”, meaning an Alien, in pencil above the “Na” written in ink. This was also done for some reason to other “Na” entries made by this census taker as well for reasons that are unknown.

The original entry for the 1910 U.S. Census very definitely reports he was a naturalized U.S. citizen eight years before the birth of his son. The draft registration reports he was a naturalized U.S. citizen no less than two months before the birth of his son. The 1920 U.S. Census record reports him as “Al” and Alien, but there are so many gross errors about age, year of immigration, the informant obviously was reporting erroneous information to the census taker. The 1930 U.S. Census reported he was a naturalized U.S. citizen, except the pen and ink entry was altered by pencil to report an Alien instead of naturalized U.S. citizen.

The natural born citizen requirement only matters to people who believe in enforcing the articles of the Constitution without bias and favortism to any party or person. Everyone else is acting in contempt of the Constitution and the principles for which it stands. It remains to be seen who will protect and defend the Constitution and who will effectively destroy the Constitution and the principles of freedom it was created to defend.


166 posted on 12/08/2010 9:04:19 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyX; LorenC
The original entry for the 1910 U.S. Census very definitely reports he was a naturalized U.S. citizen eight years before the birth of his son.

The 1930 U.S. Census reports he is “Na”, a naturalized U.S. citizen, but someone used a pencil to cross out the “Na” and write “Al”, meaning an Alien, in pencil above the “Na” written in ink.

Sorry, but I won't take your word for it. Birthers have a history of making crap up out of thin air. Show me an image of the records, or at the very least, provide a link to a site that has them.

167 posted on 12/08/2010 9:12:08 AM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyX
You are reporting the wrong census record and the wrong person. He is not the father of Spiro Theodore Agnew.

He is listed under a different name in another state and city. the 1910 U.S. Census reports he is “Na”, a naturalized U.S. citizen.

Now I've posted two images to back up my claims. You, on the other hand, have claimed that you found Theodore Agnew elsewhere in the 1910 Census.

You say it's under a different name, but you don't say WHAT name. You say it's in a different state and city, but not WHAT state and city. You provide absolutely no source or location or useful information to find this supposed entry.

Now I'm not saying it DOESN'T exist. After all, I'm relying on an entry I found for his original name; it could be a different guy with the same name. You could be right. But I've provided the record location and an image. Whereas you've provided nothing.

170 posted on 12/08/2010 9:31:47 AM PST by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson