I thought it was established the layers were from OCR?
Presidential Fraud
Why can’t we see the actual document instead of a digital copy from Obama?
Wow, a local news team actually is doing some investigative reporting. Imagine that!
Should send this video far and wide to everyone you know and ask them the question, why Obama still has not provided a copy of the original document.
(And he was armed fired at us and ran. No he was unarmed and hid behind a woman. No wait, he shoved the woman and ran, but was unarmed. Just wait until you see the pictures. Wait, there's not gonna be any pictures...)
No embossed seal? It makes one think.....
Obama will never be anything but a lowlife conspirator liar.
We have a criminal and a total defrauder in the White House. Somebody slipped up and forgot to flatten the phony BC document before releasing it to the public.
I believe the Ben Laden thing is a scheme to take the attention off of the phony BC document and raise Obumba’s ratings. Call me a kook, but there it is. When all is said and done truth will come out. God will win.
This video (the first of 4) shows the same thing in much greater detail with a much more thorough explanation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY&feature=youtu.be
Oh, and the issue of OCR came up and was thoroughly debunked.
The layers are not the thing. The Actions and backgrounds show that it is a composite; but not certain evidence of fraud.
You should post this everywhere. I don’t think many people are aware of this controversy.
ML/NJ
One important clue as to the document’s authenticity (or lack thereof) is the difference the two date stamp marks. Given the way these stamps work (e.g., the Month is a single wheel unit of 3 letters: JAN, FEB, MAR,....,AUG,), the day is of 2 separate wheels that rotate, the first being composed of “-, 1, 2, 3” and the second of “1, 2, 3,...,30,31”, the year is either of one wheel unit of four numbers, “1960, 1961, 1962,...,1969” or the first 3 numbers are one wheel unit and the second is one number: “196” “1, 2, 3, 5, 6”.
This must be true of the two date stamps on the BC:
The Month letters of “AUG” MUST have the same pitch and attitude on both stamps. The Year numbers “19” MUST have the same pitch and attitude on both stamps.
Yet, the two stamps are markedly different. That is, the same stamp was not used in both places on the document. Other Hawaiin COLB that I have reviewed have the two stamps perfectly matching. Not only was the same stamp not used — but the pitch and attitude of the letters and numbers are *IMPOSSIBLE* to have the alignment that they have - unless they were digitally created. Ahhh, that is the case: the Date stamps of “AUG -8 1961” are fake. Given they are fake, the entire birth certificate is FAKE!
Allmendream is having fits on this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2716038/posts?page=249
Claiming that the document is real and all us “birthers” have to EAT CROW. He’s having fun with all caps, too. I asked him repeatedly to rebut the points made here.
Allmendream, now’s your chance. Prove your points here!