You said it was crazy to think that they would have posted a forgery that any fool could prove was a forgery. They would never do that, so that can’t be what they posted, you said.
Makes no difference that it’s exactly what they posted.
If you’re going to use evidence to decide whether Auschwitz happened, then please use evidence to decide whether a BC forgery happened.
Specifically you might explain how the kerning happened, if it was typed in 1961 with a manual typewriter.
Or where the “white copy” came from, which has no sign of a seal anywhere.
Or why the photo taken of the “green copy” that Obama let the media see has no signs of a seal anywhere. Or even better - why nobody in the media even noticed that fact or cared. Nice watchdogs they are, huh?
Or why they would have scanned the thing in such a way to allow manipulation of the record rather than in a form that would prove it was unmanipulated. Like they scanned the “white copy” - though it doesn’t have a seal on it anywhere. It is such a sensitive scan that it has print showing from something that was BEHIND the sheet being scanned, but didn’t manage to pick up any sign of a seal. How did that happen?
This stuff is evidence. This is what the debate should focus on. The evidence.
Butter, let me ask you - YOU are the expert on Certifigate - you might know:
Did the White House issue 2 different version of Obama’s long form COLB last week? And weren’t there 2 different short form COLB’s as well back before the campaign? One issued to the Daily KOS which was quickly identified as a fake and then another shortly thereafter?
This would make a total of four “official” certificates?
Just wondering -