1 posted on
04/27/2011 10:13:47 AM PDT by
RED SOUTH
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: RED SOUTH
web site wont open can someone please paste what article says
2 posted on
04/27/2011 10:16:15 AM PDT by
remaxagnt
(`)
To: RED SOUTH; STARWISE; maggief; hoosiermama; Miss Didi; onyx
His site is crashing now. Isn’t this the guy from the comment section on smoking gun that Rush and everyone is talking about?
3 posted on
04/27/2011 10:17:54 AM PDT by
penelopesire
(Let The Congressional Hearings Begin!)
To: RED SOUTH
Might be interesting if the link worked.
4 posted on
04/27/2011 10:17:54 AM PDT by
svcw
(Non forgiveness is like holding a hot coal thinking the other person will be blistered)
To: RED SOUTH
Rush mentioned that if you put the .pdf file in Adobe Illustrator, it would show multiple layers. I did; it does. That means they added the elements that show in the blue bounding boxes THEN FORGOT TO flatten the image.
5 posted on
04/27/2011 10:18:14 AM PDT by
aphid
(Pay attention or you will lose the country you love.)
To: RED SOUTH
In a Court of Law, a prosecutor would be allowed to enter into evidence against Obama all the:
Lies, frauds, crooked house deals, cheats, political deceptions, arrogant power grabs, detours around checks and balances, under the table dealings, stonewalling etc etc etc...
And then show this supposed LFBC and warn you not to believe it.
8 posted on
04/27/2011 10:19:39 AM PDT by
Berlin_Freeper
(How is allowing an Army Doctor be prosecuted and sent to prison "good for the country"?)
To: RED SOUTH
To all those unfamiliar with Adobe software... layers are basically old cut and paste techniques.
Each image could have several separate images - these are layers.
It appears they cut and pasted here.
11 posted on
04/27/2011 10:22:52 AM PDT by
nhwingut
(Palin '12... Accept No Other)
To: RED SOUTH
12 posted on
04/27/2011 10:23:47 AM PDT by
Mortrey
(Impeach President Soros)
To: RED SOUTH
Someone help me out here: If this is a real photocopy, why would there be any layers at all? Wouldn’t a straightforward copy of a document be all in one layer? Don’t the multiple layers tell a story of some amount of manipulation?
15 posted on
04/27/2011 10:25:10 AM PDT by
libsrscum
(Obama causes cancer.)
To: RED SOUTH
19 posted on
04/27/2011 10:26:21 AM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: RED SOUTH
I looked at the certificate. I thought both parents had to be born in America. Says Obama’s father was born in Kenya. Am I missing something here?
21 posted on
04/27/2011 10:28:13 AM PDT by
Vicki
(Washington State where anyone can vote .... illegals, non-residents, dead people, dogs, felons)
To: RED SOUTH
the date 1961 has been altered, the 1 is not the same inking device as the rest of the number. It appears to have been hand written
22 posted on
04/27/2011 10:28:47 AM PDT by
stockpirate
(If they vote for socialism, support socialists, they're socialists duh....Ech bin ein Paliner)
To: RED SOUTH
Hmmm, I am not familiar with Adobe Illustrator, but normally, the ordinary Adobe Reader will also display layers if there are any in your PDF. I checked but didn't find any…
23 posted on
04/27/2011 10:29:21 AM PDT by
cartan
To: RED SOUTH
You can’t “open” a birth certficate in Illustrator or Photoshop or any other over-the counter-software and be able to root around in layers. So what is this nonsense?
25 posted on
04/27/2011 10:30:21 AM PDT by
GSWarrior
(Nothing changes if nothing changes.)
To: RED SOUTH
I took the newly released COLB and reversed it, so it would look like the other examples of birth certificates issued during that time, on the reversal of obama's you can plainly see the vertical and horizontal marks of the
Safety Paper...which is not visible on any other examples.
Reversing it also plainly shows that there is no embossed seal or the authenticity verbage:
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THE ABOVE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL RECORD ON FILE IN THE RESEARCH, PLANNING, AND STATISTICS OFFICE, HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH."
Also, the Certs are only one day apart, yet they show a completely different signature as Registrar, and obama's shows no signature for a Director of Health.
The COLB is as phony as the first one...add one more count of fraud to the kenyan's file...
38 posted on
04/27/2011 10:45:33 AM PDT by
FrankR
(no)
To: RED SOUTH; All
I’m no expert, but I know enough about retouching images, specifically text manipulation. And I am not a birther...
But just through my initial examination of the pdf, it is crystal clear it has been manipulated. For example, when I zoom in using Acrobat Professional, all the text separates ( flashes) in layers. A scanned document will not do that, unless it’s OCR. Also when zoomed in, there is clear white space added around the text. Again, a scan would not add that halo effect to the type. The white space around various text is also inconsistent, meaning that on some words, there is fatter white space around the word as though someone used a 1-2px. eraser inconsistently.
This would have been produced on a typewriter. The halo effect around the type is clearly not from a typewriter.
There is something wrong with this document, folks.
41 posted on
04/27/2011 10:46:31 AM PDT by
rintense
(The GOP elite & friends can pound sand.)
To: RED SOUTH
The hand written date on the bottom (8-7-61) by Stanley looks very similar to the hand written date on the Nordykes birth certificate.
What say you?
42 posted on
04/27/2011 10:48:03 AM PDT by
NoKoolAidforMe
(1-20-09--The Beginning of an Error..............1-20-13--Change we can look forward to)
To: RED SOUTH; Alamo-Girl; TexasCajun
Judge for yourself but looks to be composed by multiple elements. I checked out the PDF in Adobe Illustrator, just as you did. You are so right: if this document is a scan or a photocopy of an original, there would not be any isolatable, multiple elements in it.
But release the document's clipping mask in Adobe Illustrator, and it turns out that most of the type, and even parts of signatures, can be moved right off the document. Clearly, this can be no scan nor photocopy!
Plus the "security paper" used for the alleged copy shows white space behind where the moved text was. As if preexisting elements had been "whited out" to accommodate new text.
This document is definitely suspicious. I strongly doubt it is what it purports to be....
Actually, it looks like a transparent forgery to me....
Can't Obama find more skilled people to create his fakes?
43 posted on
04/27/2011 10:49:16 AM PDT by
betty boop
(Seek truth and beauty together; you will never find them apart. — F. M. Cornford)
To: RED SOUTH
Hoorah for American Ingenuity!
79 posted on
04/27/2011 11:47:48 AM PDT by
jetson
To: RED SOUTH
The Forensic
Error level analysis does not show anything suspicious for Photoshopping that I can see. Of course, the Photoshopping would be in the production of the fake original, which would then be photocopied onto the HI DOH security paper and in so doing would lose the Photoshopping artifact.
80 posted on
04/27/2011 11:49:01 AM PDT by
Plutarch
To: RED SOUTH
Finally! Now the empty suit can relax while he kisses Oprah’s butt and toranadoes plow up fly over country and texas burns down.
83 posted on
04/27/2011 11:53:36 AM PDT by
BerryDingle
(I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson