What would you and your losertarian candidate know about conservatism? Keep pushing it, and you will see a bright flash of light and smell ozone.
You probably think G.W. Bush was a conservative or John McCain. Sadly the neocons (democrats) have so messed up the conservative label it is almost meaningless today.
As a Constitutional conservative I tend to agree with Paul on a lot of issues and with 14 trillion in debt (100 trillion really) there is only one issue this election cycle, SPENDING. Now I did not support Paul last time and probably will not this time but Paul is very good on spending. It appears that most of the vile directed at Paul is because he does not support nation building in the Middle East/Asia/Africa. I also have a problem with that.
And who in the hell are you to threaten to zot anyone around here, especially someone who has an eight-year posting history senior to yours?
Unless you are a moderator or Jim Robinson in another form, don't threaten me.
If you even bothered to read the article or my posts, I said that I thought Ron Paul probably couldn't win. Just because I object to you and your little gang slandering the man and insulting anyone who thinks that he might be a factor in this election, or that he might have some good ideas on some issues, doesn't mean I am recruiting for him. I don't have to. Ron Paul's issues -- smaller Constitutional government, the economy, the bailouts, Austrian economics vs Keynesianism ,the Federal Reserve, the gold standard, the deficit, the debt -- are all in the mainstream discussion today. And like it or not, Ron Paul set the agenda years ago when no one else was even talking about it.