Posted on 04/27/2011 6:13:29 AM PDT by null and void
Just announced. Obama to speak in 45 minutes. (6:45 AM PST)
Okay, someone come up with a plausible excuse for this one.
Look at the enlarged version that I am replying to..if you look really close you can see something under the X in THE.
As if it originally said THE...they typed over it to make it darker but perhaps typed the wrong letter. It looks like something was underneath it.
Compare signature of what is said to be Mom’s SS card versus birth certificate - totally different
Nice work... Send it to Drudge and everyone you know.
Right now, we are dealing with FRAUD and possible forgery. The original COLB was fraudulent, but it wasn’t a forgery. THIS one definitely is.
and unless everything that onaka has stamped recently says TXE on it, this is a real problem for someone. that is the next step. We got to find a recent stamp by onaka.
That looks like some kind of drawing signature on the computer.
You can see her real signature on the passport files.
I tried doing that with the White House site pdf. I can’t see that letters disappear or reappear but the white around them is evident. The “K” in Kenya is wonky as are a few others. What’s with all the penciled (?) in numbers and such? See that “S” in the second signature? That’s the same as how Stanley Ann usually writes her capital “S”. Notice that there’s one “r” in Sr.’s name instead of two. Maybe she didn’t know him well enough to know how to spell it which makes one wonder if he was just the daddy-patsy.
WoW!
Thank you for the ping..
I can see at least 3 different fonts with naked eye..
ALSO, it is still listing Sr’s RACE as AFRICAN ...
Hmmm..
Bikk
I am starting to wonder what all this birth certificate stuff is drawing out attention from?
We are all watching the left hand, what is he doing with the right?
Do you remember the procedure for that stamp that has the registrars name on it?
What do they use to do it?
Is it on a machine or some kind of handheld device???
No. BTDT, and no, that's not how it's done. Filing and registering goes on arrival time only. That's why documents are time stamped with hours, minutes, and sometimes seconds rather than merely the date.
I would presume it is an auto stamp done by a machine.
It is a very clear “THE” on mine. However, it’s a had stamp, so some of the other letters are blurred. Its the same stamp as it looks to me.
Honestly guys, this looks legit to me. But them I have thought for a long time that the cretin had documents on file n Hawaii.
Now we KNOW he does. It’s time to move on. The REAL issue is Natural Born Citizenship. How can a Man be born under the British Nationality Act of 1048 and be a Natural Born Citizen of the United States? According to John Bingham the author of the 14th Amendment, he was NOT born under the sole jurisdiction of the United States, and is therefore NOT a Natural Born Citizen.
This has ALWAYS been the issue we could not get past... No one would look at NBC until the bloody Birth Certificate was dealt with. I consider it dealt with! I want to get onto the issue which makes him ineligible!!!
He was BORN BRITISH and we now have CONFIRMATION of that fact!
Or is the 14th Amendment no longer valid????? ummmm hum.
The stamp with Onaka’s name on it is one stamp. The date is a separate stamp. Both are hand stamps. This is what was told to me by clerks at HDOH who use them.
We are all watching the left hand, what is he doing with the right?
The Federal reserve (The Bernake) held a press conference today. First time in 97 years.
Good luck finding out what was said...
My bad, the DATE stamp is done on a machine. The Signature stamp is a hand stamp. Please pardon the mistake!!!!!!!
The 2007 stamp does have blurred letters.
But there is NO WAY that the “X” in “THE” in the 2011 document is the result of a blurred stamp.
So then there has to be an explanation of how it got there.
Is it psy ops to get people riled up to misdirect them while Bernake testifies....
Or did someone screw up a forgery and not catch it.
I have no idea. I just know THE is not spelled right.
Interesting aspect of using II, rather than Jr:
http://www.drdaveanddee.com/jr.html
However, using the II (not Jr.) often means a man does not have his father’s name, but another relative such as his grandfather or uncle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffix_%28name%29
The suffix II is used when the child has an identical name to a relative, but who is not the child’s father. The relative may be an uncle, cousin or grandfather.
Whoa! I spoke too soon. The words do disappear and come back.... Que the Twilight Zone music.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.