Posted on 04/23/2011 6:48:54 AM PDT by Rudder
Just ask the Obamoid koolaid drinkers these two simple questions, and watch their heads spin.
1. What hospital was Obama born in?
2. What is the name of the doctor who delivered him?
As our government increasingly is oriented at the political benefits from “rent seeking”, it will implement its policies and laws in ways that allow it to exercise “discretion” and grant waivers. This allows it to solicit various side benefits and circuitous bribes like we see with bailouts to unionized companies and union pension funds for unions that donate to Democrat candidates.
The long-term effect of this is seen in the news that General Electric did not owe any taxes on its billions in profits. It found it was a better investment to have 600 attorneys and accountants in its tax compliance department than to hire 600 engineers to develop new products.
Mr. Shapiro,.......That is NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT the question!!!!
The question is: "Is Barack Obama a natural born citizen?????!!!!"
Mr. Shapiro, you have ignored this important question for THREE YEARS!!!!!! This article of yours is merely an attempt to cover your naked body with fig leaves. For financial, social, and political reasons you failed to do your job! SHAME on you!
Obama-lama-ding dong brought this upon himself. Had he not floated some bogus “Cerficate of Live Birth” instead of a real birth certificate, then he would have have his feet to the fire. Of course he can only accept part of the blame. The other half goes to that utter waste of $5 worth of chemicals Pelosi, who approved it. And you know GOOD AND WELL, she knew she was circumventing the Constitution when she approved it.
I had a debate with a kool-aid drinker yesterday. No lie, she said with a straight face:
“Well, don’t you know that the GOP front runner, Donald Trump was born in Mexico??? I saw the birth certificate!”
Liberals will believe *anything*. One that he’s a “front runner”, two that BS fake Mexican birth certificate they posted on Daily KOS was real.
To me the key here is, knowing the controversy here, no one (with few exceptions) wants to correct the problem by doing the two things necessary to keep this from happening again: (1) requiring a formal vetting and proof of qualifications for office; and (2) tightening the voting process to prevent fraud in the counting and casting of votes.
One must ask, what would be the motive for not correcting the problem? Who are against correcting the problem?
We are engaged in a dynamic struggle for the heart and soul of a way of life, and we are losing the battle for freedom and individuality.
If we have to believe in collective salvation, please let me know which organizations I need to join in order to get to heaven, and what are the minimum requirements for membership.
Lastly, who can I get to pay my dues for me?
if we’re soooo dumb, then they won’t mind not receiving any of our tax money
because i’m still trying to figure out why i’m supposed to send my property to the scam artists in washdc. after all, since they have ignored article 2 section 1 of the Constitution... and it has no serverability clause... the whole contract is out.
including... amendment 16
The author is incorrect. Obama doesn't “appear” un-American, he is un-American. The reason Obama is anti-American is because he is part of the leftist portion of the Democrat Party all of whom hate America and are trying to destroy it.
The reason Americans want to know more about the true story of Obama’s birth and early life is that we are tired of being lied to. The official story of Obama being born in two separate hospitals and that no one can ever obtain the actual birth certificate with the actual place of his birth and the signature of the attending physician is simply not credible. There is also the fact that Obama has spent millions of dollars in legal fees to prevent the truth from being known.
Add to that the obvious forgery of the original Certification of Live Birth and the refusal of officials in Hawaii to be forthcoming about the document and intelligent people naturally become curious.
Shapiro and damn near everyone else in the media.
It looks like Trump may be the only valid American to possible "have standing" when it comes to a challenge. No other Presidential candidate seems to have the guts or resources ($) to put up a good challenge and have indisputable "standing". I'm no fan of Trump, but let's see how far he'll take it.
Either the Constitution is to be respected, it needs to be respected in its entirety. Now we hear that SCOTUS does not want to go through another Constitutional crisis like Gore/Bush/Florida. Well, they may not have much choice in taking up this one at some point in time.
Rent-seeking
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In economics, an economic agent is said to exhibit rent-seeking behavior whenever it attempts to derive economic rent by manipulating the social/political environment in which economic activities occur. An example of rent-seeking is the limitation of access to skilled occupations imposed by medieval guilds.
Many current studies of rent-seeking focus on efforts to capture various monopoly privileges stemming from government regulation of free enterprise competition. The term itself derives, however, from the far older practice of appropriating a portion of production by gaining ownership or control of land.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent-seeking
Ewww...nasty.
born June 14, 1946 in Queens, New York, NY (Meets the Jus Soli Requirement)
Parents were
Frederick Christ Trump, born October 11, 1905 in Queens, NY, died June 1999 in Queens, NY
Mary Ann MacLeod, born May 10, 1912 in SCOTLAND, died August 7, 2000 in Queens, NY. Arrived in US October 5, 1935. Naturalized as a US Citizen March 10, 1942.
Both parents were US Citizens at the time of his birth (Meets the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)
Donald Trump is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN unlike Comrade Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama.
When Nobel Prize winning poet Tony Morrison can write an October 1988 New Yorker article titled “Clinton as the first black president”, then what is “black”? When the NAACP calls the black conservative Kenneth Gladney, “not black enough”, and “not a brother” then what is “black”? When Time magazine’s Jack White calls Supreme Court Justice Thomas, “the scariest of all the hobgoblins”, saying “Washington seems to be filled with white men who make black people uneasy”, than what is “black”? And when Obama, a man whose mother is Caucasian, can tell us in a widely read autobiography that in his youth he struggled with his racial identity before *deciding* to be black, what is “black”?
When Bill Maher, during a panel discussion on HBO complains that Obama’s policies are “half-assed” “because hes only half black.” and that “if he was fully black, Im telling you, he would be a better president.”, and that “there’s a white man in him holding him back”, than what is “black”?
CNN’s Soledad OBrien writes of a private meeting in 2007 with Jesse Jackson in her book, The Next Big Story. During the meeting, Jackson complained to OBrien, whose mother is a black woman from Cuba, that there werent any black anchors on CNN. She wrote, “He looks me in the eye and reaches his fingers over to tap a spot of skin on my right hand. He shakes his head. You dont count, he says.” She closed the section with “[t]he arbiter of blackness had weighed in. I had been measured and found wanting.”
“Black” in all these contexts, as well as Juan Williams’s complaint on Fox News that the extraordinarily lopsided expression of Missouri voter sentiment in August of 2010 rejecting ObamaCare was really about race, is clearly not about “race”. It is about ideology, socialist ideology.
As these expressions of “black” pile up in the mind of the public, more and more will wake up to this truth: socialists will say anything, pull any heart string, evoke any tear and will descend to any dirty trick to advance their favored cause. If we think they have reached bottom with Juan William’s complaint or Bill Maher’s comparison, you haven’t seen anything yet. And that is exactly why these people must be disempowered, defunded and shown to be the frauds they are.
As far as I am concerned, we are all made in the image of God. While we all have the same rights and deserve the same respect, none of us have greater rights or deserve greater respect than anyone else.
With respect to BHO being black: it is not about the race he was born with, it is about the ideology he adopted. It is not what percent black he is, it is about how thoroughly red he is.
Oliver Warobi
(My college roommate from Kenya.)
Obama, his friends and fellow travelers, and the RINOS (who seek MSM grace.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.