Just ask the Obamoid koolaid drinkers these two simple questions, and watch their heads spin.
1. What hospital was Obama born in?
2. What is the name of the doctor who delivered him?
As our government increasingly is oriented at the political benefits from “rent seeking”, it will implement its policies and laws in ways that allow it to exercise “discretion” and grant waivers. This allows it to solicit various side benefits and circuitous bribes like we see with bailouts to unionized companies and union pension funds for unions that donate to Democrat candidates.
The long-term effect of this is seen in the news that General Electric did not owe any taxes on its billions in profits. It found it was a better investment to have 600 attorneys and accountants in its tax compliance department than to hire 600 engineers to develop new products.
Mr. Shapiro,.......That is NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT the question!!!!
The question is: "Is Barack Obama a natural born citizen?????!!!!"
Mr. Shapiro, you have ignored this important question for THREE YEARS!!!!!! This article of yours is merely an attempt to cover your naked body with fig leaves. For financial, social, and political reasons you failed to do your job! SHAME on you!
Obama-lama-ding dong brought this upon himself. Had he not floated some bogus “Cerficate of Live Birth” instead of a real birth certificate, then he would have have his feet to the fire. Of course he can only accept part of the blame. The other half goes to that utter waste of $5 worth of chemicals Pelosi, who approved it. And you know GOOD AND WELL, she knew she was circumventing the Constitution when she approved it.
To me the key here is, knowing the controversy here, no one (with few exceptions) wants to correct the problem by doing the two things necessary to keep this from happening again: (1) requiring a formal vetting and proof of qualifications for office; and (2) tightening the voting process to prevent fraud in the counting and casting of votes.
One must ask, what would be the motive for not correcting the problem? Who are against correcting the problem?
We are engaged in a dynamic struggle for the heart and soul of a way of life, and we are losing the battle for freedom and individuality.
If we have to believe in collective salvation, please let me know which organizations I need to join in order to get to heaven, and what are the minimum requirements for membership.
Lastly, who can I get to pay my dues for me?
if we’re soooo dumb, then they won’t mind not receiving any of our tax money
because i’m still trying to figure out why i’m supposed to send my property to the scam artists in washdc. after all, since they have ignored article 2 section 1 of the Constitution... and it has no serverability clause... the whole contract is out.
including... amendment 16
The author is incorrect. Obama doesn't “appear” un-American, he is un-American. The reason Obama is anti-American is because he is part of the leftist portion of the Democrat Party all of whom hate America and are trying to destroy it.
The reason Americans want to know more about the true story of Obama’s birth and early life is that we are tired of being lied to. The official story of Obama being born in two separate hospitals and that no one can ever obtain the actual birth certificate with the actual place of his birth and the signature of the attending physician is simply not credible. There is also the fact that Obama has spent millions of dollars in legal fees to prevent the truth from being known.
Add to that the obvious forgery of the original Certification of Live Birth and the refusal of officials in Hawaii to be forthcoming about the document and intelligent people naturally become curious.
It looks like Trump may be the only valid American to possible "have standing" when it comes to a challenge. No other Presidential candidate seems to have the guts or resources ($) to put up a good challenge and have indisputable "standing". I'm no fan of Trump, but let's see how far he'll take it.
Either the Constitution is to be respected, it needs to be respected in its entirety. Now we hear that SCOTUS does not want to go through another Constitutional crisis like Gore/Bush/Florida. Well, they may not have much choice in taking up this one at some point in time.
When Nobel Prize winning poet Tony Morrison can write an October 1988 New Yorker article titled “Clinton as the first black president”, then what is “black”? When the NAACP calls the black conservative Kenneth Gladney, “not black enough”, and “not a brother” then what is “black”? When Time magazine’s Jack White calls Supreme Court Justice Thomas, “the scariest of all the hobgoblins”, saying “Washington seems to be filled with white men who make black people uneasy”, than what is “black”? And when Obama, a man whose mother is Caucasian, can tell us in a widely read autobiography that in his youth he struggled with his racial identity before *deciding* to be black, what is “black”?
When Bill Maher, during a panel discussion on HBO complains that Obama’s policies are “half-assed” “because he’s only half black.” and that “if he was fully black, I’m telling you, he would be a better president.”, and that “there’s a white man in him holding him back”, than what is “black”?
CNN’s Soledad O’Brien writes of a private meeting in 2007 with Jesse Jackson in her book, “The Next Big Story.” During the meeting, Jackson complained to O’Brien, whose mother is a black woman from Cuba, that there weren’t any black anchors on CNN. She wrote, “He looks me in the eye and reaches his fingers over to tap a spot of skin on my right hand. He shakes his head. “You don’t count,” he says.” She closed the section with “[t]he arbiter of blackness had weighed in. I had been measured and found wanting.”
“Black” in all these contexts, as well as Juan Williams’s complaint on Fox News that the extraordinarily lopsided expression of Missouri voter sentiment in August of 2010 rejecting ObamaCare was really about race, is clearly not about “race”. It is about ideology, socialist ideology.
As these expressions of “black” pile up in the mind of the public, more and more will wake up to this truth: socialists will say anything, pull any heart string, evoke any tear and will descend to any dirty trick to advance their favored cause. If we think they have reached bottom with Juan William’s complaint or Bill Maher’s comparison, you haven’t seen anything yet. And that is exactly why these people must be disempowered, defunded and shown to be the frauds they are.
As far as I am concerned, we are all made in the image of God. While we all have the same rights and deserve the same respect, none of us have greater rights or deserve greater respect than anyone else.
With respect to BHO being black: it is not about the race he was born with, it is about the ideology he adopted. It is not what percent black he is, it is about how thoroughly red he is.
Shapiro begins with the observation that:
Americans are desperately seeking an answer to a simple question: why does President Obama appear to be so un-American? The term un-American here is not synonymous with anti-American (though Obama has been that on occasion); instead, it merely signifies that President Obama is unconcerned with typical American principles and traditions. He sees capitalism as selfish and evil, religion as dangerous and oppressive; he sees the Constitution as antiquated and entrepreneurialism as exploitative ... When America elects a president like this, many Americans begin wondering how it happened.
Shapiro continues:
If he was [born abroad], the unspoken logic goes, we can understand where he picked up his un-American philosophy. He is not one of us – he is rather a member of the same global community that despises America and tolerates Islamism, that slams American consumerism and praises Chinese communism, that rips evangelical Christianity while ignoring Muslim-imposed clitorectomy. We need not worry about our domestic institutions, goes the line of thought – instead, we must focus on protecting ourselves from foreign infiltration.Shapiro concludes:More realistically, however, President Obama is the culmination of a century of foreign infiltration already in place. The turning of America’s institutions of higher education took place decades ago; it is too little too late to focus on such infiltration now.
Even as Wilson and Roosevelt began implementing German philosophy in American government – with disastrous results including the decimation of growing American industries and a bizarre foreign policy focused on global institutions rather than American interests – Europeans abroad began to plan the next step of the American takeover.
The philosophy of the Frankfurt School, making an alliance with trendy French post modernism, spread like wildfire through the academic world. Traditional history courses were torn down in favor of “queer” studies, black studies, Asian studies, women’s studies; language was deconstructed in order to remove its capitalistic foundations; traditional sexual mores were torn asunder in the name of “tolerance.”Personally, I can't dispute either Shapiro's arguments or conclusions.President Obama was the result. He grew up abroad, to be sure, but he spent most of his educational career right here in the United States, indoctrinated in the traditions of the progressives and the Frankfurt School. Ironically enough, the biggest problem for America arises if President Obama was born here – because if he was, the problem of un-Americanism is now internal rather than external. Perhaps that is why so many Americans wonder about the birth certificate – they hope against hope that President Obama is a symptom of a foreign ill rather than a domestic one. No matter whether Jerome Corsi comes up with evidence of Obama’s foreign birth, however – it is clear that the problem of Obama-esque un-Americanism is now endemic to American culture herself. We have an ideological problem in our midst, and no amount of digging in Kenya and Indonesia is going to solve a problem that now starts right here.
This article cited Woodrow Wilson as being un-American, which I agree with. Jimmy Carter anyone? If Obama was born here, it's not a NEW problem but an OLD problem that keeps showing up over the course of the last 100 years. I think the people that HAD to vote for McCain knew what Obama was about, because the know what the Democrat Party stands for.
Something HAS to be done about the infiltration of education, that IS the problem. Obama is a problem, but not THE problem; the problem is the people that elected Obama, their indoctrination.
I seem to remember a really stupid mainstream media getting so caught up in old documents from GW’s past - they threw their support behind an obvious forgery. And THAT story didn’t even have any affect on GW’s eligibility.
Why are the american people so stupid?
The american people wonder why the media is so stupid.
Anyone who thinks the public outcry will force the release of the original document is either crazy or doesn’t have a clue about the power of the Presidency to have a perfect counterfeit put in place.
Does this sound like I’m a conspiracy nut?
Yet another excellent commentary (seems I’ve read hundreds over the past 2 years) exploring yet another controversial aspect of the mysterious Barack Hussein Obama Jr.
Dozens of controversies, tons of proof ... and all we do is talk. Nothing is done.
Obama openly admits his father was a British citizen, which disqualifies him from “natural-born citizen” status and thus from the office of the Presidency. And nothing is done.
Violations of the Constitution are everywhere. And nothing is done.
Gee, let’s talk about this some more. Maybe that will help. /s
My birth certificate has an imprint of my feet on it. It has the name of the doctor who delivered me on it and athe name of the hospital. It has the date and time of the delivery on it. So does Obama’s. Let’s see it. Not a bunch of coverup by a Democratic party trying to hold onto power in spite of the Constitution. Face up to it Democrats. There will be no election win without the Birth Certificate. We will not let it happen again that Mr. Obama will thumb his nose at the American People. By now, there are enough of us who want the Constitution to stand as written, that we will vote that way. Buzz words and Catch phrases will not cut it for this man again.