Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama to Boeing: Drop Dead
Ricochet.com ^ | 4/21/2011 | Claire Berlinski

Posted on 04/21/2011 5:02:28 PM PDT by BfloGuy

This could well be the most outrageous insult yet to the free market economy:

In what may be the strongest signal yet of the new pro-labor orientation of the National Labor Relations Board under President Obama, the agency filed a complaint Wednesday seeking to force Boeing to bring an airplane production line back to its unionized facilities in Washington State instead of moving the work to a nonunion plant in South Carolina.

Do I need to explain how many kinds of wrong this is? Not only is the federal government saying to Boeing that it gets to decide where it puts its production lines, it's telling South Carolina it may as well not enact laws designed to attract investment. All that's missing are the words "Five Year Plan."

Remember those two recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board? The guys making these decisions about the commanding heights of the American economy have never even been confirmed by the Senate.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: antibusiness; boeing; claireberlinski; nlrb; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: re_nortex

If I were looking for work in another state, I’d use that as a rough guide as to which ones to move to, nicht wahr?


21 posted on 04/21/2011 5:24:24 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (A thorough knowledge of the Bible is worth more than a college education. TR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

Obama sez-—>>>

Washington State = Obama voters/ Female Democrat Governor and same for both US Senators
South Carolina = conservative red necks, screw ‘em they won’t vote for me anyway in 2012


22 posted on 04/21/2011 5:28:06 PM PDT by dennisw (nzt - "works better if you're already smart")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy
pro-labor

There we go again letting the media define a word for us. The Grifter-in-chief and his thugs are pro-union, which in todays world means that they are anti-labor. Same number of skilled jobs would be at the SC plant as at the Wa. plant with the only difference being that the workers in SC don't belong to a union. And as far as I know the Madison, Wisconsin union riots, er peaceful demonstrations, were done by union workers not performing the job they were hired to do.
23 posted on 04/21/2011 5:34:17 PM PDT by crazyhorse691 (Obama makes me yearn for the good ol' days of Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

America is under communists control now and the election in 2012 may put the communists black Muslim King Obama in for another term. The corrupt organization is showing the power they have..


24 posted on 04/21/2011 5:34:28 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

This is horrifying. Theres no decision beyond their grasp.


25 posted on 04/21/2011 5:35:20 PM PDT by wiggen (The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If I were looking for work in another state, I’d use that as a rough guide as to which ones to move to, nicht wahr?

It wasn't a hypothetical for me. I'm a Pennsylvania native and long wanted to flee because of the iron clench of big labor on the Keystone state, especially in the western region. Plus a DemonRAT machine (in cahoots with the unions) has controlled Allegheny County since the 1930's.

Among the metrics I put foremost in my evaluation of where to relocate was that it absolutely had to be a right-to-work state. I was forced to join a union in Pennsylvania against my will and play dues to local. Although I did lead a successful campaign to decertify the union and get it kicked out (to the joy of both the management and we workers), the battle was tough and led me to look elsewhere for a place more attuned to my Conservative Christian views. The result?

Right to work and no income tax! (Now we just have to get the illegals back over the Rio Grande).

26 posted on 04/21/2011 5:35:43 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I guess now Boeing will have to move out of the country instead. Way to go Obama.


27 posted on 04/21/2011 5:36:12 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
Instapundit calls it enforcing the anti-dog-eat-dog law.
28 posted on 04/21/2011 5:37:09 PM PDT by BfloGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

WA is a blue state and SC is a red state. Case closed.


29 posted on 04/21/2011 5:41:03 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

Actually, it is one of the provisions of Wesley Mouch’s list of directives at the end of Part 1, Chapter 10.


30 posted on 04/21/2011 5:41:34 PM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

What self-respecting company would do business in the State of Washington anyway?


31 posted on 04/21/2011 5:42:45 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS; Windflier
And move corporate out of Illinois.

We thought we had them locked up here in Texas for the relocation (with Plano and Irving on the short list). Everyone here was astonished when Boeing announced the move was from Seattle to Chicago?!?!?

The bumbling fool Ron Kirk Dallas mayor at the time and, in 20/20 hindsight I blame him for botching what was surely a cinch. (Ping to windflier for an opinion on this).

32 posted on 04/21/2011 5:43:03 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

This is what marxists do, we don’t own any property they do via controling the means of production, Hitler used this very same meathod in Germany.

It will continue to work here until we get off of our lazy, fat asses.


33 posted on 04/21/2011 5:44:41 PM PDT by stockpirate (Sarah, the time is NOW!. .....................Ech bin ein Paliner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussiebabe

Yeah, they did. I don’t remember Obummer or any of his minions complaining when that happened.

They moved, not to get to Chicago, but to get out of the state of Washington with its crappy business climate. Not real sure how they figured Chicago, or Illinois, would be better. They probably got some tax relief for a couple of years or something.


34 posted on 04/21/2011 5:55:10 PM PDT by vvpete (Obama is a post turtle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Do a safety recall on Air Force One and make 0bama go back to a prop winder.


35 posted on 04/21/2011 5:55:34 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex
Interesting that Boeing chose to relocate their corporate HQ from Seattle to Chicago, both RAT strongholds. I read recently that was because the executives' wives considered Chicago to be culturally superior to the DFW metroplex.
36 posted on 04/21/2011 5:56:35 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy
I can find in the Constitution words to the effect that Congress has the power to regulate commerce between the states, but no where do I see such power delegated to the Executive, nor do I see any reference to a National Labor Relations Board, much less it having any authority over interstate commerce. Constitution? What Constitution? Obama don't need no stinking Constitution... (/sarc)
37 posted on 04/21/2011 5:56:42 PM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vvpete

One of the reasons that Boeing picked Chicago is that the Boeing CEO is a big fan of The Lyric Opera and The Chicago Symphony. Those were two assets that Dallas could not match.


38 posted on 04/21/2011 5:59:30 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex
We thought we had them locked up here in Texas for the relocation (with Plano and Irving on the short list). Everyone here was astonished when Boeing announced the move was from Seattle to Chicago?!?!?

Thanks for the courtesy ping. I wasn't aware that Boeing had DFW on their short list of destinations, nor that we lost out to South Carolina, but the news that they're going to move their plant to Chicago is pretty scary.

There's no doubt in my mind that they're being forced to do this. They set their sights on greener pastures (like a lot of US companies are doing - Lord knows a lot of them are coming here), but Chicago is hardly a place that will improve the fortunes for that company.

If the Obama administration can force a huge company like Boeing to do this, then what's next? Are they going to put a padlock on the exodus out of California and other high tax, union dominated states, and tell the businesses there to like it or lump it?

This must not stand.

39 posted on 04/21/2011 6:00:50 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior

It’s not ObamaNomics, it’s Obamunism.


40 posted on 04/21/2011 6:02:32 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Natural Born Taxpayer on Board...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson