[Red Badger]

Basically the courts are saying they do not want to second guess the ‘experts’..................

[Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)]

Thank you for your reply.

My thoughts in general:

^%$(^ )(@#%$ %&%^$#!!!!

Thank you again.

My very best to you.

[DBeers]

Basically the courts are saying they do not want to second guess the ‘experts’..................

In so many words they also proclaim that the only way to curtail the EPA is legislatively and the only way to stop the EPA is to do away with the EPA.

Congress must act.

[MasterGunner01]

The Court doesn't want to “second guess the experts”? By ruling CO2 was something that could be regulated by the EPA, the SCOTUS justices established themselves as quasi-experts.

Now these same justices say the EPA folks are “experts”? Well, which is it, boys? Are the EPA “experts” or are the SCOTUS justices “experts”? It cannot be both. To say both is like saying your wife is only half pregnant.

The time has come for states to tell SCOTUS and the EPA they have NO intention of obeying any kind of crap that flows down from either. For that matter, the states should tell FedGov to pound sand with all their rules, regulations, and garbage. Further, the states stop sending tax monies to DC or take any filthy money from DC.

[DAC21]

Basically the courts are saying they do not want to second guess the ‘experts’..................

Well is that the opening we need to go after, litigating that that the “experts” knowingly generated fraudulent date to support there case?

[DAC21]

Basically the courts are saying they do not want to second guess the ‘experts’..................

Well is that the opening we need to go after, litigating that that the “experts” knowingly generated fraudulent date to support there case?