Basically the courts are saying they do not want to second guess the ‘experts’..................
Well is that the opening we need to go after, litigating that that the “experts” knowingly generated fraudulent date to support there case?
You have to prove that they ‘knowingly’ generated fraud, and the data they used was ‘knowingly’ false when they used it. Then you have to get to the source of their data, and the source of their data, and the source of their data. It is an intricate can of Gordian worms.
No, the courts are not the answer in this instance. We have to get control of Congress and the Presidency. Then we can limit the EPA’s mission to ordinary pollution, not ‘maybe’ pollution in a 100 years...........