Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will It Take A New Political Party to Save America?
American Thinker ^ | 04/15/2011 | Lee Carey

Posted on 04/15/2011 6:59:03 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: stboz

Trump is the only person who is showing real strength with his comments. He may be more of a force than people expect. His comment yesterday about wealthy Jewish backers of Obama is something no politician in America would have the courage to say. Likewise; his opinion on Iraqi oil.


21 posted on 04/15/2011 7:34:49 AM PDT by Baynative (Truth is treason in an empire of lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]



Just Hanging Around Eating at Free Republic?
Haven't donated yet?

Sign up to donate monthly
and a sponsoring FReeper will donate $10
Save Lazamataz! Donate today

22 posted on 04/15/2011 7:39:00 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Given that we now have only one party - the Government Party, comprised of both Dems and RINOs, both contriolled by globalist entities, and both having moved well beyond the limited government our Founders sought to encode in their now thwarted efforts at a Constitution - yes: We need a new party.

But I’m afraid we will not get one without large scale bloodshed first.


23 posted on 04/15/2011 7:43:27 AM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It will not be a third party.

There is only one party now the Rino-Dem party.

The rest of us are only hanging on to the fringe’s


24 posted on 04/15/2011 7:57:45 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If the GOP runs a liberal in 2012 (Romney, especially), all bets are off. If a decent conservative runs under the Tea Party banner, I will donate to, work, and vote for that candidate.


25 posted on 04/15/2011 8:04:30 AM PDT by Antoninus (Fight the homosexual agenda. Support marriage -- www.nationformarriage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Half of Democrats are to the right of half of Republicans.

Until this changes, there is really only one party.


26 posted on 04/15/2011 8:14:32 AM PDT by fnord (Republicans are just the right-wing of the left-wing of American politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I'm feeling so cynical I don't even care if it does. I just cain't wait to punish my so-called conservative Rep in the next election. He has the audacity to brag about the "biggest cuts in history". Anything but Republican or Democrat. This is the first time I've ever said something like that.
27 posted on 04/15/2011 8:18:14 AM PDT by Theophilus (Not merely prolife, but prolific!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“As we citizens hunker down in the back seat, tightening our seat belts, some of us see the cliff close enough to warrant pulling the emergency brake with the fierce urgency of now in order to avoid a Thelma & Louise event.”

Interesting article, but the writer goes off the track right here.

I wrote about this yesterday in another thread, but let me draw an analogy insofar as “putting on the brakes” is concerned.

Think for a moment of a heavy freight train going down a mountain grade. Yes, it has brakes (both for regular “service” and additional “emergency” capacity). But the sum total of the train’s brakes is capable of only so much “braking horsepower” that can be applied against the momentum of the moving train. As the train speed increases, so does the kinetic energy built up within it. A point will be reached where the train has so much forward momentum that ALL the brakes applied with the FULL AMOUNT of braking power (which is actually “emergency”) will not be able to stop it. The applied brakes might provide some retarding force and slow the train, but what can happen is the brake shoes will actually burn and melt away — and leave the train with no brakes at all. This actually happened in southern California some years’ ago, when a train overloaded with Bauxite ran away down a grade called “The Palmdale Cutoff”, then crashed and destroyed several homes (and a day or two later, a ruptured gas line caught fire and destroyed more of them).

In that wreck, when the engineer first realized the train was reaching a point where control would be lost, he went right to “full service” on the brakes (full service is the most brake you can get without going one step more to emergency). At first, there was some braking, but because the train had more weight than the brakes could handle, the brake shoes actually melted. I believe when he realized full service wasn’t enough, the guy went right to emergency, but by then the damage was done, for once the brake shoes are destroyed, there’s no way to brake the cars anymore. And that was that.

Well, told you that to tell you this:

We have accumulated so high a “mountain” of debt already — and it continues to grow at such an astronomical rate — that the “debt train” may now have so much “weight” and momentum that (like the doomed train above) there’s no way to “brake it” anymore. Even “emergency” actions may no longer prove effective.

And once that point is passed, all that remains is a wreck ahead.

And as I wrote yesterday, perhaps the only way left that the train can be “fixed” is for it to first derail and be so damaged that no one in power will be able to deny what repairs must be made to make it operable again.

Whether it will take “a new political party” to effect such repairs, I can’t say.

But I’ll offer another thought:

Most trains these days have more than one engine, running “in multiple”. In the America of today, we have two factions of thought that are so diverse that they no longer seem able to work together, or believe together. Of course, I’m referring to the red states vs. the blue states. The differences seem so un-bridgeable that it’s almost like a new Civil War could be in the offing. Even such a leftist as Jerry Brown in California admitted this a couple of days ago.

The train wreck is coming.

But AFTER the train wrecks, might the engines be repaired separately, and then “go their own ways”?

One train, down a track that leads to freedom and prosperity and the rights of the individual as envisioned more than two centuries ago by The Founders?

And the other down a multi-culti leftist track to who-knows-where?

Just sayin’....


28 posted on 04/15/2011 8:23:44 AM PDT by Grumplestiltskin (I may look new, but it's only deja vu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fnord

Half of Democrats are to the right of half of Republicans.

Conversely,

Half of Republicans are to the left of half of Democrats.


29 posted on 04/15/2011 8:23:55 AM PDT by fnord (Republicans are just the right-wing of the left-wing of American politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Straight and simple, the answer is YES....the existing parties are filled to the brim with nutless idiots. =.=


30 posted on 04/15/2011 8:27:10 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

obama MUST be defeated in November.
Any siphoning of Republican votes this election will spell doom for this country.....


31 posted on 04/15/2011 8:27:44 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
There is simply no good reason to create a third party when any party is ultimately controlled by voters.

Do you think that those you elected are actually representing you? About 77% of the people in this Nation are opposed to national health care, but what happened? Most congresscritters have totally forgotten that they are there to represent, not rule.

If Conservatives simply left the GOP rather than trying to second guess what can be done with that leadership, there would still be a two party system. It just wouldn't be based upon the established bozos.

32 posted on 04/15/2011 8:30:09 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

You know, even during the Revolution... those that wanted a Revolution against Britain and an independent United States were in the minority.

What made the others of our nation turn in support was the fact that those that did... actually LED via words and deeds.

And the same applies here. There is only a minority now that support a new Conservative party. But should it happen, and those in it LEAD with good ideas and sound judgement, others will follow.

And then the changeover to the new political reality takes place, even though - initially, only a few backed the idea.


33 posted on 04/15/2011 8:33:50 AM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Grumplestiltskin

I am all for secession.


34 posted on 04/15/2011 8:34:11 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

Have we accomplished much if we just get the I want to do the same thing as obama, just cheaper and slower... in obama’s place?

Both parties know what to do, one will not because of it would end its very existence, and the other party has half of its members wanting what the liberals want and the other half doesn’t have the fortitude to do what they know must be done to save the Republic.

I think we have passed the point of no return. It’s 1860 all over again and a great chasm is upon us. I don’t know what form it will take but our way of life is about to change.


35 posted on 04/15/2011 8:37:20 AM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68
Any siphoning of Republican votes this election will spell doom for this country.....

From observation, I don't think there is any major difference in the two parties. This Nation is doomed regardless of who sits in the oval office. The Nation is idealogically split down the middle with neither group attempting compromise. It is time to split the Nation, peacefully, with mutual consent.

36 posted on 04/15/2011 8:39:18 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Ecclesiastes 3:8 NIV
a time to love and a time to hate, a time for war and a time for peace.

We need the right time and someone to know that time.


37 posted on 04/15/2011 9:09:24 AM PDT by americanmother (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
As I understand it, several states have constitutional provisions prohibiting deficit spending, and most residents of those states (including democrats, republicans and independents) are just fine with having such restrictions on their state legislatures.  So, this idea is not something that would necessarily be unpopular with the majority of the people.
 
We need to amend our federal constitution to require our Congress spend no more than the total of actual revenues, AND a companion provision requiring a minimum of 2/3 vote of both houses of Congress to increase taxes upon the people of the country.
 
This would change the whole ballgame and then we the people would have a snowball's chance of getting a runaway government under control and avoiding an economic collapse. It would not be the end of the matter, but would force our elected representatives to set national priorities and live within our means, etc.
 
There would be no more artificially set "debt limits" to argue about raising periodically. Instead, there would be "revenue limits" (and therefore spending limits) to deal with. If Congress wanted to add a new program, opponents would have a solid constitutional reason to give to their constituents for rejecting the new program, or would be forced to propose tax hikes to pay for it, or eliminate other spending programs equal to the cost of the proposed new program.
 
Imo, THIS is what fiscal conservatives should work toward and unite behind, rather than just giving up without having at least tried this first.

38 posted on 04/15/2011 10:49:43 AM PDT by Let_It_Be_So
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

If, as you write, our representatives won’t represent us, forming a new party isn’t going to solve the problem.


39 posted on 04/15/2011 10:55:55 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (Coming soon! DADT...for Christians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla

When someone actually makes a reasonable case for a third party, maybe then I’d consider it. The simple fact is, if conservatives don’t wield enough power to take over the Republican Party, then it’s irrational to think they’re going to win the country with an entirely new party.

Virtually every well known conservative thinker says the third party route is suicide, but some persist in their delusions of political grandeur. Again, if we can’t even muster up enough political strength and enthusiasm to move the Republican Party to the right, how are we supposed to win control of the country...from scratch...with an entirely new party???

I understand the hostility toward RINOs, but if there’s enough enthusiasm and energy for a new party, why not invest that toward reforming the Republican Party? They already have the apparatus to win national elections and millions of virtually guaranteed votes (yeah, some folks vote the party ‘cause it’s all they’ve ever done). Republicans are the best chance conservatives have of turning this country around.


40 posted on 04/15/2011 11:22:48 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (Coming soon! DADT...for Christians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson