When will they accept they lost?
It Begins!
When the communists hand you the play book, you play by it.
What theatre!
I see the ‘boys’ talked to her.
Why does it seem that people go out of their way to minimize the value of their excerpts?
They give us 300 words — we should use them to get across the point of the article.
Anyway, the jist of the article is that the democrats told the 80-year-old to write something damaging, so she did.
But if you read the entire article, what you find is that this democrat is confused as to why “nothing” came up in canvasssing about a “15,000-vote” error.
Of course, the reason nothing came up in canvassing is because there was never a 15,000-vote error in the vote tabulation. There were in fact SOME errors in vote reporting, with a couple hundred votes switching back and forth, or being added or subtracted, as they canvassed the precincts comparing the reported totals against a re-evaluation of the actual data.
But obviously, when they looked at the city numbers, the 15,000 votes they found matched the 15,000 votes that were REPORTED.
Because the problem with that city wasn’t an ERROR in the report, it was a failure to transmit the report. The City didn’t mistakenly report 0 votes, they correctly reported the votes, but someone forgot to send them on. That’s not an “error” that a canvassing board corrects, because the canvassing board is checking individual results against what was reported.
It is pretty much assumed that as the canvassing board completes each area, they then officially send the numbers. If absolutely NO numbers had been reported before canvassing started, there would still be NO canvassing errors related to the lack of reporting — just good numbers being reported from canvassing.
In my opinion, that might be a better way to do things in places where they are so incompetent they can’t seem to report things correctly.
It’s not a big deal in more modern places where they have figured out how to do fancy cutting and pasting.
Is this woman senile, or has someone been threatening her grandchildren?
Ping
....who was widely quoted ....
She said it LIVE on a televised Press Conference. The paper makes it sound like it was some kind of popular hearsay. Play the *()() tape.
She was widely quoted because she was quotable.
Poor thing, I honored her for her ernestnest in the press conference.
Here’s the latest from the state election blog. The State official says the votes are there, always have been. The Clerk just screwed up in what was reported to AP, which when you think about it - who gives a rip?
GAB Director Kevin Kennedy says the agency’s investigation of spring election procedures in Waukesha County remains ongoing, but that the final canvass numbers in the city of Brookfield match the initial tallies from poll workers on Election Night.
“We don’t see, at this point, any criminal activity, but we certainly see practices that need to be changed to bolster public confidence,” Kennedy said.
GAB staff is now the process of matching those numbers for all Waukesha County wards after Brookfield ballots were mistakenly left out of Election Night returns from the county clerk. The numbers tentatively turned a razor-thin lead for Supreme Court candidate JoAnne Kloppenburg into a margin of more than 7,000 votes in favor of incumbent Justice David Prosser.
Kennedy also said GAB staff is reviewing Election Night practices in the county, saying he hopes to give the public and the press greater access to the county’s results and break them down by voting precinct so that the 24 voting wards in Brookfield wouldn’t be overlooked in future elections.
Kennedy also said the Milwaukee County canvass likely won’t be done until Wednesday.
Jibe talkin’.
He’s getting phone calls fron all the Dem Orgs threatening his family, I’m sure.
Remember what the Democrats did to the county clerk from 2000?
You REALLY don’t want to be a Democrat that becomes an enemy of the Obamunist State right now.
They're fighting for their very existence. The facts are irrelevant.
I notice the majority of the comments are pro Republican...that is good!
Wisconsin - County Vote Results
County Precincts D. Prosser (i) J. Kloppenburg
Total 3630/3630 739,886 50% 740,090 50%
I like this new technique of “zero-reporting” strongly conservative areas until just before the vote certification.
Some precincts/areas always seem to lag behind in reporting their votes, until they know how many “votes” are needed to swing an election. Waukesha is counted as “reported” and no one notices that their report did not increment the statewide counters. Then, when it is too late for the Dim precincts to “update” their vote totals, Waukesha comes up with their confirmed numbers. Thereby reducing opportunity for election theft.
I recall the 2008 Dim primary in Indiana. The East Chicago/Gary/Hammond votes did not come in until very late in the evening; after it had been determined that Hillary had won with more than 100K vote margin. If it had been closer, then it might have gone the other way with “found” votes coming in from that area.
This should say it all.
They "got" to her.
Jean, I understand that Milwaukee canvass results aren’t in yet....any concerns being circulated among WI conservatives about that?
Thanks in advance to any who have good info, will check back later.
You can always tell a Democrat, but you can never tell them much.