[tpmintx]

I like this new technique of “zero-reporting” strongly conservative areas until just before the vote certification.

Some precincts/areas always seem to lag behind in reporting their votes, until they know how many “votes” are needed to swing an election. Waukesha is counted as “reported” and no one notices that their report did not increment the statewide counters. Then, when it is too late for the Dim precincts to “update” their vote totals, Waukesha comes up with their confirmed numbers. Thereby reducing opportunity for election theft.

I recall the 2008 Dim primary in Indiana. The East Chicago/Gary/Hammond votes did not come in until very late in the evening; after it had been determined that Hillary had won with more than 100K vote margin. If it had been closer, then it might have gone the other way with “found” votes coming in from that area.

[tcrlaf]

“I recall the 2008 Dim primary in Indiana. The East Chicago/Gary/Hammond votes did not come in until very late in the evening; after it had been determined that Hillary had won with more than 100K vote margin. If it had been closer, then it might have gone the other way with “found” votes coming in from that area.”

And the DEMOCRAT Mayor of Valpo (Hillary supporter) going on CNN and saying the fix was in in Gary, that’s why they were holding back vote returns.

[fwdude]

I like this new technique of “zero-reporting” strongly conservative areas until just before the vote certification.

Yes, I do, too. Keep 'em guessing. An incredibly shrewd strategy.