Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Rights For State Workers Upheld (states cannot pass laws that limit rights to negotiate)
Official Wire ^ | 4/01/11

Posted on 04/04/2011 12:58:17 AM PDT by Libloather

Federal Rights For State Workers Upheld
Published on April 01, 2011
by Staff Reporter
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS (USA)

A U.S. district court judge has ruled states cannot pass laws that limit private-sector workers' rights to negotiate job terms, a union attorney said.

"The state can't legislate workers' rights," said attorney Terrance McGann, who represented the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters in a case challenging a 2010 law in Illinois intended to allow exhibitors at Chicago's McCormick Place convention hall to bypass paying overtime, the Chicago Tribune reported Friday.

Judge Ronald Guzman's ruling upholding the National Labor Relations Act on behalf of the carpenters and Teamsters Local 727 will seriously set back efforts to bring business back to the convention hall, which has been losing business to cheaper locations such as Orlando, Fla., the newspaper said.

Jim Reilly, a trustee at the Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, an agency run by Chicago and the state of Illinois, said, "The implementation of those (state) reforms has, virtually overnight, transformed McCormick Place."

"Not only were our existing customers convinced to keep their events in Chicago, but new shows have been rapidly signing up."

**SNIP**

McGann said the ruling could have implications in other states. State governments legislating worker rights "is exactly what they are trying to do to public employees in Wisconsin, in Indiana, in Ohio," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at officialwire.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: judge; laws; state; teamsters; workers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
judge has ruled states cannot pass laws

Wow.

1 posted on 04/04/2011 12:58:26 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Congratulations to the union thugs and their lawyers - - they can now die along with the Convention Center.
Really, who cares?


2 posted on 04/04/2011 1:03:09 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

No, this applies to private-sector, not public workers.


3 posted on 04/04/2011 1:10:00 AM PDT by Varsity Flight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Do taxpayer’s have rights? Let’s form a taxpayer’s union and go on strike.


4 posted on 04/04/2011 1:11:04 AM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Ronald A. Guzman is an Article III federal judge in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, one of the busiest courts in the nation. He joined the court in 1999 after being nominated by President Bill Clinton.

Early life

Justice Guzman graduated from Lehigh University with a Bachelor’s Degree in 1970 and his juris doctorate degree from New York University Law School in 1973.

Legal career

Guzman started out as a private practice attorney for two years. In 1975, Guzman became an Assistant states attorney for Cook County until 1980. For the next four years, he served as a staff attorney for the Association House of Chicago, a Chicago Community center, while also working as a private practice attorney until his appointment to the federal judiciary.

Federal judicial career

From 1990 to 1999 Guzman served as a US Magistrate Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Then in 1999 on the recommendation of Illinois Senator Dick Durbin, Guzman was nominated by President Bill Clinton on August 5, 1999, to a federal seat vacated by Brian Duff. Guzman was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on November 10, 1999, and received commission on November 15, 1999.
_____________________________________________________

A Liberal — no surprise there!


5 posted on 04/04/2011 1:14:56 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

In other words, government cannot pass laws against organized crime.


6 posted on 04/04/2011 1:16:29 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

>> states cannot pass laws that limit private-sector workers’ rights to negotiate job terms

And the problem is what?

Providing the swift beat-down of thuggery and intimidation, there’s no reason why organized labor should be restricted in any sense whatsoever. If we’re talking about liberties, this is part of the deal.


7 posted on 04/04/2011 1:18:43 AM PDT by Gene Eric (*** Jesus ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Bill Clinton appoints this Puerto-Rican born Chicago-based community activist lawyer from Cook County, and we're supposed to ne surprised?

The only worse this judge could be is if he had married into the Daley family.

8 posted on 04/04/2011 1:18:49 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The Democrat Party is Communist. The Republican Party is Socialist. The Tea Party is Capitalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

BTW, in post #7, I’m talking about PRIVATE organized labor.

Collective bargaining that involves taxpayer dollars should be outlawed (save exceptions for LEO and emergency services).


9 posted on 04/04/2011 1:21:59 AM PDT by Gene Eric (*** Jesus ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Why do they get an exemption?


10 posted on 04/04/2011 1:26:31 AM PDT by aliquando (A Scout is T, L, H, F, C, K, O, C, T, B, C, and R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

It’s time for RICO charges, IMHO. Seems like breaking rocks is the last chance for the taxpayers to remain free.


11 posted on 04/04/2011 1:27:26 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

What an incredibly mis-leading headline.


12 posted on 04/04/2011 1:30:59 AM PDT by XHogPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aliquando

“They” being the cops?


13 posted on 04/04/2011 1:32:41 AM PDT by Gene Eric (*** Jesus ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot

Astoundingly so.


14 posted on 04/04/2011 1:34:09 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot
What an incredibly mis-leading headline.

Agreed, but that's what you get from those crappy on-line wannabe "news" sites.

15 posted on 04/04/2011 1:36:19 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Yes, and the firefighters.


16 posted on 04/04/2011 2:14:00 AM PDT by aliquando (A Scout is T, L, H, F, C, K, O, C, T, B, C, and R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: aliquando; Gene Eric

Why should cops receive special protection?


17 posted on 04/04/2011 2:47:35 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Including “Right To Work” as well,judge?
18 posted on 04/04/2011 2:57:15 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("WARNING" -Sarah Palin is a very dangerous woman--she defends herself when attacked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Except the Fed government has already OUTLAWED collective bargaining for their own employees as per Jimmy Carter who stripped them of this so called “right” when he was president.


19 posted on 04/04/2011 3:02:00 AM PDT by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I seem to have trouble finding that judges can make laws per the Constitution.

Can someone help me out here by showing me where it’s at in the document?


20 posted on 04/04/2011 3:08:56 AM PDT by DH (48th TFW, A&E Lakenheath England, 67-70)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson