Posted on 04/01/2011 11:11:19 AM PDT by raccoonradio
U.S. Sen. Scott Brown an upstart Blue State Republican in the cross hairs of national Democrats is lashing out at the partys opposition researchers, accusing them of prying into his familys private health insurance records, and demanding that they stop fighting dirty.
(snip)
A DSCC spokesman insisted the request was only for public information and never sought private medical information about the Brown family.
Obviously, the commission has made a mistake. Now Brown is trying score cheap political points to distract from his record, voting in lock step with Republicans in Washington, D.C., said spokesman Matt Canter. Brown votes with the Republican establishment 98 percent of the time, and that makes him out of step with Massachusetts, Canter added. Democrats will mount a strong campaign to elect a senator that cares more about creating jobs, than saving his own.
GIC officials could not be reached for comment, but a letter sent by the agency to Browns lawyer Tuesday warns some or all of the material requested may constitute personal data.
(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...
“There must be a thousand FReepers who regret having
sent the SOB-RINO-minime a dime.”
I know two of them...
There must be a thousand FReepers who regret having
sent the SOB-RINO-minime a dime.
I know two of them...
And I’m still kicking myself.
I don’t know - it was fun at the time, and for the “Kennedy seat” to go to a republican (even if he’s a RINO) - THAT was satisfying.
Remember - we were all very depressed at that point, and that election put momentum in our favor.
I don’t know - it was fun at the time, and for the “Kennedy seat” to go to a republican (even if he’s a RINO) - THAT was satisfying.
Remember - we were all very depressed at that point, and that election put momentum in our favor.
The ACU gives him a 74% rating.
Hey Scott, these are the people you're aligning with when you make your "principled" stands against your own party.
It was exciting at the time. The main concern was for Brown to beat that awful woman. We trusted that Brown would be true to his campaign rhetoric.
I think most of us (a very big assumption, I know) wouldn’t give a damn if Brown were defeated next year. He lied during that campaign and is not one of us.
Besides, wouldn’t the political world seem natural again with two Rat senators in Washington? That’s what those people deserve..they’ll never learn what Dems stand for, anyway.
Senator Scott Brown votes with the GOP much more than a “Senator Martha Coakley” ever would, and this is a good thing! Senator Scott Brown isn’t conservative enough for me and for the majority of conservatives, but he’s, still, much better than the political alternative.
The ‘Rat Party really wants to make the MA delegation a one-party one again.
98%? That’s some fuzzy math right there.
“And Im still kicking myself.”
Me too. I could have used my donation to wipe my a$$ with; at least I would have got use out of it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.