Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy

That is exactly what Hamilton believed when he pointed to the inability of a Bill of Rights to control tyrants.


46 posted on 03/31/2011 12:43:18 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: arrogantsob

Just as they knew the Constitution was inadequate for any non-moral people, they knew that it wouldn’t restrain a determined tyrant.

They made the assumption of moral people in the country and in office.


48 posted on 03/31/2011 12:50:48 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: arrogantsob
That is exactly what Hamilton believed when he pointed to the inability of a Bill of Rights to control tyrants.

You are correct. He basically stated that this bill of rights would become a pretext for abusing what wasn't explicitly stated in said rights.

51 posted on 03/31/2011 12:53:34 PM PDT by frogjerk (I believe in unicorns, fairies and pro-life Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson