One problem is the courts continually rule that nobody has standing in this issue.
Enlisted men don’t have standing.
Voters don’t have standing.
Even elected federal office holders don’t have standing.
Who, in the court’s opinion, does have standing to bring this issue to court?
The next GOP Nominee.............
Here's a quick primer. If you want to hear Barack Obama actually have to tell the truth, you don't have standing.
I don't know, but will guess that a primary opponent who lost to him might.
A State would have standing because the POTUS is the President of the UNITED STATES
This is the great evil in this situation. The Constitution is the most basic law in the land. The current status is that no one is empowered to enforce the constitution. What is the insidious long term impact of that on the enforcement of all laws in general?
Anyone running against him would have standing. If every candidate makes a big deal about showing his BC something will have to happen. Should even one state require candidates show their BC Obama will have to come back to Chicago permanently or show his.
There is not even a real need for anyone outside a state legislature to call for Obama per se to do anything.
There is only reason to follow up if it is done in the right way. Do NOT go for impeachment. It turns folks off, it won’t work, and it would give us Joe Biden. What we WANT is the 2012 elections... what we WANT is to expose the Media for being so totally in the tank for Democrats that they are worthless. We want to swing independent voters & to motivate the base. Leave O in office until we win both houses & the executive — that is the winning play.
They are wrong. We do have standing.
The House has standing. But Nooooo!