9th Circuit Court to hear eligibility questions

World Net Daily ^ | March 30, 2011 | Bob Unruh

[circumbendibus]

Arguments in a lawsuit on Barack Obama's eligibility that has been percolating through the federal court system in California since the 2008 election will be heard at the appellate level in just a few weeks.

Officials with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals today notified attorneys representing several dozen individuals – members of the military, members of state government and even a candidate for president – that oral arguments will be held May 2.

"I can't believe it, but after two years of Obama litigation, for the first time the court of appeals scheduled oral argument in [the] Obama case," wrote Orly Taitz, a California attorney who has litigated a number of challenges to Obama.

[Brown Deer]

The statement that you quoted from ProtectOurFreedom. What’s so confusing to you?

[trumandogz]

Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq was an American ally, and a friend of the Reagan Administration in the fight against Communism and aided us in running the Soviets out of Afghanistan.

Why would you now question Ronald Reagan's foreign policy, the very same foreign policy that saved the world from communism?

[circumbendibus]

Still, oral arguments will be allowed. Several of the plaintifs were on the Ca ballot fo US President. They should have “standing” to have there arguments heard and adjudicated. ;)

[Brown Deer]

Why would you now question Ronald Reagan's foreign policy, the very same foreign policy that saved the world from communism?

I didn't. You did.

Why do you continue to ignore my questions and only reply with unrelated questions? Do you deny any specific facts in the posted biography of the ruthless radical Muslim dictator General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq?

[opentalk]

updates from the trial

..possible live Cspan coverage of oral arguments