Posted on 03/30/2011 9:01:16 PM PDT by circumbendibus
Arguments in a lawsuit on Barack Obama's eligibility that has been percolating through the federal court system in California since the 2008 election will be heard at the appellate level in just a few weeks.
Officials with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals today notified attorneys representing several dozen individuals members of the military, members of state government and even a candidate for president that oral arguments will be held May 2.
"I can't believe it, but after two years of Obama litigation, for the first time the court of appeals scheduled oral argument in [the] Obama case," wrote Orly Taitz, a California attorney who has litigated a number of challenges to Obama.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
The statement that you quoted from ProtectOurFreedom. What’s so confusing to you?
Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq was an American ally, and a friend of the Reagan Administration in the fight against Communism and aided us in running the Soviets out of Afghanistan.
Why would you now question Ronald Reagan's foreign policy, the very same foreign policy that saved the world from communism?
Still, oral arguments will be allowed. Several of the plaintifs were on the Ca ballot fo US President. They should have “standing” to have there arguments heard and adjudicated. ;)
..possible live Cspan coverage of oral arguments
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.