Posted on 03/30/2011 3:49:30 PM PDT by bjorn14
WASHINGTON -- After a brief reprieve, U.S. immigration authorities are once again denying applications for immigration benefits for same sex couples following a legal review.
Chris Bentley, a spokesman for the U.S. Citizenship and Services agency, said Wednesday that a review by lawyers from the Department of Homeland Security, it was concluded that a law prohibiting the government from recognizing same sex marriages must be followed, despite the Obama administration's decision to stop defending the constitutionality of the law in court.
The law, the Defense of Marriage Act, defines marriage as being between a man and a woman.
Earlier this week, USCIS announced that applications from foreigners married to a U.S. citizen of the same sex would be held in "abeyance" while the legal review proceeded. Bentley said Tuesday that the temporary hold on application decisions was not a change in policy.
Bob Deasy, of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said the latest ruling is a "disappointment."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
We don’t have enough of them so we have to import them?!
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Earlier this month a New York-based immigration judge decided to postpone a deportation order against an Argentine lesbian married to a U.S. citizen.
Now we import them.
Doing the sodomizing Americans won’t do?????????????
I know, shoot me, that was bad.
But possibly true. The quickest way to destroy a country is overwhelm it with undesirables of questionable morals. The communists must be loving that their plan is working.
Why not bring in a man and his four wives? They’re in love just as much as any two homosexuals are. At least they say they are. And who are we to judge?
That’s next. And claiming that pedophiles were “born that way”.
There -now its accurate.
GOOD!
If homosexuals are born that way, than pedophiles and those that prefer goats are also born that way, by their (non) logic.
It is the slippery slope, once you say there can be no restraint on sexual morality. Such a defiling of the human body in such demeaning way should be illegal. At least, the government forcing children to embrace such a filthy behavior and allowing media to glorify such a dehumanizing act which causes disease and destruction to the body. (What about cigarette ads????Cigs are SAFER!!!!?????)
Forcing our troops to watch homosexual behavior defies their freedom of religion and conscience and will destroy what is left of the moral US military.
Why is zero trying to destroy character and honor in our military? Oh, ya, he is the marxist/muslim/homosexual in chief and is working for a caliphate or one world government for his puppet master. He will need the military to fight for islam and turn on their own families and country and Israel. He wants to destroy our moral military and create inhumane one based on the pederasts of Afghanistan and ancient pagan Greece.
Just Law is based on Natural Law Theory—the laws of nature. It is the basis of our government. It is unjust law to recognize special rights for an unnatural behavior.
True. And Hitler, too, was born “that way.”
There really is no difference between the homosexual argument for “love” and polygamy, bestiality or whatever. Once you abandon procreation as the reason for marriage, ALL bets are off.
Immigration Office Back to Denying Pedophile Visas
Why would the US want to import more vermin magnets? We have enough infectious diseases to pass around in the “gay” community.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.