Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN OKs Libya airstrikes, no-fly zone
MSNBC.com ^ | 03/17/11

Posted on 03/17/2011 4:04:30 PM PDT by MissesBush

UN OKs Libya airstrikes, no-fly zone Military action could follow within hours; Gadhafi tells The U.N. Security Council authorized a no-fly zone over Libya and called for Arab states and others to use "all necessary measures" to protect civilians from attacks by Moammar Gadhafi's forces.

The resolution passed 10-0 with five abstentions.

The resolution establishes “a ban on all flights in the airspace of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya" while excluding an occupation force. It also calls for freezing the assets of the Libyan National Oil Corp. and the central bank because of links to Gadhafi.

French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe flew to New York Thursday to press the case for speedy Security Council approval.

The world is "living one of its great revolutions that changes the course of history," Juppe told the Security Council just before the vote.

The United States, France and Britain pushed for speedy approval because Gadhafi's forces are advancing toward opposition-held Benghazi. The Libyan leader vowed Thursday night to oust the rebels from their eastern stronghold.

Thousands of anti-Gadhafi protesters cheered and let off fireworks on Friday to celebrate the vote. Al Jazeera television showed the crowd firing guns in the air, setting off fireworks and waving flags from the monarchy era in celebration.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: france; gadhafi; islam; kadaffi; libya; noflyzone; unitednations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-152 next last
To: MissesBush

My theory is that the Saudis strong-armed the Arab League into going along with this thing. Why? Gaddafi tried to knock off Crown Prince Abdullah (now king) back in 2003. Very bad move on his part, especially given that the man he picked to do the job was arrested and sang like a canary. I have to wonder if Abdullah is looking beyond revenge in looking to topple Gaddafi.


81 posted on 03/17/2011 5:28:51 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

From the little bit I’ve been able to glean, the French and Brits are going to lead in the air strikes, the Egyptians are providing arms, expertise and assistance across the border, the Italians are providing runways for take-off and the US is providing logistical and probably some strategic help and the Arab League is providing “cover”. Up to this point I’ve not heard we’re actually flying any missions.


82 posted on 03/17/2011 5:29:08 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

Nice going 0. Wait until the war is about over to take decisive action.


83 posted on 03/17/2011 5:29:17 PM PDT by Drill Thrawl (I don't prep for the disaster. I prepare for the rebuilding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90
This means a likely ground invasion of Tripoli.

"The draft resolution, backed by the western nations and the Arab League, calls for immediate action "to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi, while excluding an occupation force".

The UN Security Council resolution calling for action just short of an invasion is being proposed by Britain, France and the United States, though the US was earlier hesitant in supporting the joint British-French proposal to enforce the no-fly-zone over Libya.

UN Security Council Set To Vote On Libya Resolution

An invasion is not authorized by this resolution.

84 posted on 03/17/2011 5:31:40 PM PDT by Palmetto Patriot (How much better off would we be if these bastards would just leave us alone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
So, just WHO is supposed to enforce and pay for this no fly zone?


85 posted on 03/17/2011 5:35:34 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: KittenClaws
The U.N. made George Bush jump through hoops, yet they condone obama’s actions in a few days?

The UN had a good thing going with the oil for food program until Bush had to go and screw it up for them. Mo should have spent more on bribes and less on clothes.

86 posted on 03/17/2011 5:39:31 PM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

I’m all for us staying out of it also. Dadgumit, it is time for someone else to step up and take on some of this stuff. I am sick and tired of our people being wounded or killed getting rid of two bit dictators who cannot threaten anyone except by sending out a bomber or two. Reagan taught the guy a lesson with one air strike. How many strikes will it take the Frogs or Limmies to get his attention.


87 posted on 03/17/2011 5:39:48 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (The Lord Said It and I Believe it. Read your Bible. These are the end time events.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Or shorter, abstained countries are the entire BRIC Plus SPLIT NATO

It will be interesting to see what will happen if Daffy sinks French ship in Libya's territorial waters. France will not be able to invoke Charter 5 > ship sunk in North African waters, outside of Europe or North America.

88 posted on 03/17/2011 5:40:12 PM PDT by DTA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
Up to this point I’ve not heard we’re actually flying any missions.

No, nothing has been decided yet. (That we know about.) But a lot is being talked about.

US readying plans to enforce Libya no-fly zone

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said he believes President Barack Obama has authority to commit U.S. forces to participate in the no-fly zone without congressional approval.

But he said he hopes Congress will bless the move once it takes place.

Thanks, Linseed! /s

89 posted on 03/17/2011 5:40:47 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

Fine, let the UN get all their little airplanes and go enforce it... with out U.S.

Too little too late is what it is. A useless symbolic gesture now.

Unless the USAF needs target practice with the F-22, which I doubt, let’s keep our troops and airmen home.

The Arabs want to help out, fine, we sold them a bunch of good aircraft let them go burn off some fuel.


90 posted on 03/17/2011 5:48:58 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Half the people are below average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Send in “UN troops”. They’ll take control of things by raping the women and the children (just like they have done in Africa).


91 posted on 03/17/2011 5:49:37 PM PDT by hal ogen (1st amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

French military action. Oh Pah-lease. They’ll bail on the runway because it’s too dark.


92 posted on 03/17/2011 5:51:07 PM PDT by Drill Thrawl (I don't prep for the disaster. I prepare for the rebuilding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTA

It will be interesting to see what will happen if Daffy sinks French ship in Libya’s territorial waters. France will not be able to invoke Charter 5 > ship sunk in North African waters, outside of Europe or North America.


France can not invoke charter 5 anyway (It does not work when YOU are the attacker) nor can they use the EU defence agreement (to drag all the EU countries into this war) because again it does not work when you are the attacker.


93 posted on 03/17/2011 5:52:02 PM PDT by darkside321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

From the shores of Tripoli to the shores of Tripoli.

Sounds like Deja’ vu all over again.


94 posted on 03/17/2011 5:58:21 PM PDT by slorunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

Keystone Kops diplomacy in action. What are we gonna do? Save all two rebel survivors?


95 posted on 03/17/2011 6:02:28 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush
New administration, still about the oil. Who's controlling the puppets strings?

Last I checked Libya was a sovereign state.

96 posted on 03/17/2011 6:05:25 PM PDT by Amish with an attitude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
Here are some other folks talking about sending our fliers in too.

U.S. Air Force: F-22 expected to be used in 'early days' of any Libyan no-fly zone

Under questioning from Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.), Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz said it would be his "expectation" that F-22 fighters "would be in use" during "the early days" of a no-fly zone mission.


97 posted on 03/17/2011 6:10:42 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

For the metal heads that can’t stand the UN....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6c_5Sn3D6BE


98 posted on 03/17/2011 6:16:39 PM PDT by CommieCutter (Promote Liberal Extinction: Support gay marriage and abortion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amish with an attitude

Last I checked Libya was a sovereign state.


Yep but you forgot that Libya is a svoreign state with a LOT of OIL.
Never asked your self while every European country (beside germany) voted for this resolution?
Guess why? Right, every single one had oil contracts there.
Allways follow the money or in this case the black liquid form of money.
This will explain most of worlds politics.


99 posted on 03/17/2011 6:17:08 PM PDT by darkside321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Hmmm..that raises the stakes considerably- I’d believed we were going to be largely background.

Amazing this decision was seemeingly made overnight. Not 48 hours ago it wasn’t happening. So will he be the first president to send our military into a mission of this nature without so much as a chat with Congress? Or does the blessing of the “international community” now do the job of Congress?


100 posted on 03/17/2011 6:32:42 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson