Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scythian

Entirely appropriate course of action.


3 posted on 03/17/2011 1:25:54 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The KG9 Kid
Entirely appropriate course of action.

He just finished telling us how safe they were. In fact this will be little more than another massive waste of money to appease idiots who think our nuclear plants are running with no oversight.
13 posted on 03/17/2011 1:29:53 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid

As long as he doesn’t mandate a shutdown until the review is completed.


20 posted on 03/17/2011 1:32:46 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid
Entirely appropriate course of action.

Fair point. I'd have a lot more confidence in this if it didn't come from an Administration infested with Gaia-worshiping leftists. I have to believe that regulatory capture/justification of existence is going to make the NRC say that all is well. There is a high rise full of NRC bureaucrats in my neck of the woods and I doubt they are going to put the knife in the back of nuclear power. Not so sure about others in this Administration, however.
23 posted on 03/17/2011 1:34:03 PM PDT by rockvillem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid

“Entirely appropriate course of action.”

####

Because the Communist Administration and its army of bureaucrats CERTAINLY knows more about nuke safety than the utility companies and their engineers who are running these facilities.


27 posted on 03/17/2011 1:35:38 PM PDT by EyeGuy (Gimme Shelter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid

Appropriate IF his goal is to assure the plants are safe,

but I’d bet anything the goal is to find an excuse to shut them down.


30 posted on 03/17/2011 1:37:04 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid
Entirely appropriate course of action.

Yes, unless he also recommends powering them down during the review!

35 posted on 03/17/2011 1:40:07 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid
Entirely appropriate course of action.

LOL! Sure, we'll spend a couple million and have a bunch of inspectors crawling over nuke plants for the next two years. They will conclude that the plants are up to spec for the design they were intended for. We already have a dozen government agencies that signed off on the original designs. The problem is when you get a plant designed to handle a 8.7 earthquake and 5 meter tsunami hit with a 9.1 earthquake and a 10 meter tsunami. This is pure political theater.

41 posted on 03/17/2011 1:47:41 PM PDT by ScreamingFist (Quiet the Idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid

“Entirely appropriate course of action”

IF he were an objective, rational human being!

However!
Since he’s agenda driven, you will find he will use the results (no matter their content), to justify halting further development, and likely shutting down existing facilities.
This is the anti-American, anti-captialist, anti-industry, population control, President we’re talking about!


50 posted on 03/17/2011 1:59:15 PM PDT by G Larry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid

there is nothing wrong with checking our nuclear plants , of course this will probay be used to close down plants and stop making any more. not good for America


52 posted on 03/17/2011 2:04:21 PM PDT by omegadawn (qualified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid

“Entirely appropriate course of action.”

Agreed.

ANY president would have and should have done this.

I don’t like him any more than any one else here — and probably considerably less so than many — but anyone in this forum who wants to be taken seriously regarding the future of nuclear power would expect no less than a thorough review of safety systems and procedures.

This is ESPECIALLY so for those plants here in the USA that are near fault lines. It’s time for backups on the backups.


54 posted on 03/17/2011 2:06:02 PM PDT by Grumplestiltskin (I may look new, but it's only deja vu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid
Entirely appropriate course of action.

Yeah, like we're going to have 9.0 earthquakes and massive tsunamis in states from New Hampshire to Florida, nearly all of which have nuclear power plants. Oh, we especially gotta watch out for those tsunamis in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Iowa, Illinois, Ohio, Missouri, Arkansas, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Texas, Nebraska, Kansas, and Arizona dontcha know.

Taking a break now to roll my eyes and laugh uproariously.

76 posted on 03/17/2011 2:43:41 PM PDT by Wolfstar ("If you would win a man to your cause, first convince him that you are his friend." Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid
Entirely appropriate course of action.

Entirely stupid course of action. Regulations are already in place for design and operation. You can not regulate a change in reality -we got the designs we got...

This is nothing more than taking advantage of an opportunity to grow government -spend more money, and DO NOTHING!!!!

114 posted on 03/17/2011 3:59:44 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid

“Entirely appropriate course of action.”

I disagree, I think the NRC has plenty of inspections and reviews now. A nuke plant is one of the most regulated and inspected places on Earth. What will be discovered by another review?

I suspect he’ll recommend shutting a few down “temporarily” for “safety concerns” “for the children”.

He felt the need to Do Something because of Japan. He feels better now.


120 posted on 03/17/2011 4:17:05 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid

“Entirely appropriate course of action.”

Why? Are you expecting a 9.1 earthquake?


126 posted on 03/17/2011 4:32:20 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (HARRY: Money Mob & Influence (See my Expose on Reid on amazon.com written by me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid
Entirely appropriate course of action.

...IF its purpose is simply to ensure that our nuclear facilities are as failsafe as possible, rather than to help fulfill an ideological agenda.

134 posted on 03/17/2011 5:20:11 PM PDT by RepublitarianRoger2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid
Entirely appropriate course of action.

Insuring nuke plant safety is one of the government's roles... and therefore has been his responsability since he took office. In theory, recent events in Japan shouldn't change any of that.

137 posted on 03/17/2011 5:23:40 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid
Entirely appropriate course of action.

I agree. I will add that I think most Americans would be shocked at the state of many of our nuclear facilities.
147 posted on 03/17/2011 6:28:49 PM PDT by khnyny (What exactly is a CDO??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: The KG9 Kid
Entirely appropriate course of action.

Except this is the Obama administration. It'll be used to regulate nuclear power out of existence if they can swing it.

161 posted on 03/18/2011 4:38:40 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Obama, recreating-in-chief until Fri, Jan. 20, 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson