Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/17/2011 1:23:43 PM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: Scythian

He shut down Gulf drilling. Now he wants to find an excuse to end nuke power in the US, to leave us totally dependent upon his foreign masters.


109 posted on 03/17/2011 3:47:41 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Give me a break, the nuke industry is THE MOST REGULATED energy sector in the U.S. Those guys can’t take a crap without having some regulated procedure. Who is going to perform the inspections? The same people that are there all the time.

All this will amount to is additional overtime for government employees.


110 posted on 03/17/2011 3:53:38 PM PDT by mmanager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Obama-Come-Lately


111 posted on 03/17/2011 3:55:06 PM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

What an extreme embarrassment this idiot pretender to the presidency is. But, as always, my thanks to each and every idiot who voted for him.


117 posted on 03/17/2011 4:06:12 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (Remember, Reflect, Renew: 2011, 10 years since 9/11. Never Forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian
The president said U.S. officials do not expect harmful levels of radiation to reach the West Coast of the continental U.S., Hawaii or Alaska. He repeated the statement for emphasis.

Someone needs to clue these idiots in the media in some facts.

Radiation requires a source -either a radioactive source or something contaminated by a radioactive source. Each and every item contaminated has a half-life -many measured in hours...

Will the US see radiation -not unless we see contaminated particles that have not decayed...

Americans are in more danger from radon gas (that also sets of radiation detectors) in their basements than they are in danger from Japan...

118 posted on 03/17/2011 4:08:17 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Why not just do this in places prone to 9.0 earthquakes and tsunamis? Why everywhere?


119 posted on 03/17/2011 4:13:55 PM PDT by PghBaldy (Like the Ft Hood Killer, James Earl Ray was just stressed when he killed MLK Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Wow. I am so comforted that President Know Nothing about Anything Scientific is assuring US that we’re ok. I may ask my daughter to steal some of her science teacher’s potassium iodide. Just in case.


122 posted on 03/17/2011 4:21:02 PM PDT by petitfour (Are you a Dead Fish American?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

“examine nuclear plants to ensure they can withstand earthquakes and other disasters. “

This is done during the design process. There are scads of standards that must be followed.

IEEE_323 requires testing of all the components of a plant, right down to lightbulbs and toilets, to assure they will survive a worst-case quake at end-of-life for that component. This is why a simple industrial control switch costs $98 if put on a CNC machine but $2245 if put in a nuke control panel.

There are also many standards for the design of the building itself, and more standards for the piping, and separate requirements for valves and pumps and backup batteries.

So what he’s ordering has already been done!

This may cause some of the models to be re-run with “new seismic data”. One way the greens would try to stop a plant from being built was to wait until the structural and piping seismic design was signed off, then “find” a new fault or “find” a new motion for an existing fault (academia can provide this), forcing a re-design. Do this four times and your $300 million plant goes over a billion, and yo have not even broken ground.

His action on this was aimed at people who do not know how plants are designed, and licensed.

And I fully expect at least one plant to be shut down “temporarily”.


123 posted on 03/17/2011 4:28:21 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Obama is in a corner now. He is gradually permitting nuclear power at a rate slow enough not to raise the wackos.

That plan is now toast........ except if he provides a new report rehashing the old news.

Nucs in their present form are ok.

The new nucs are safe


133 posted on 03/17/2011 5:19:15 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Ready for the California style rolling blackouts?


144 posted on 03/17/2011 6:15:44 PM PDT by Darksheare (Dear Interdimensional Monstrosity, I fear our relationship has taken a turn for the worse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Starting to sound like the oil spill disaster. Shut everything down and “necessarily skyrocket” the energy prices.


148 posted on 03/17/2011 6:39:35 PM PDT by jackv (The darkness hates the light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Their scrutiny for safety is so closely monitored any further inspection will have more inspectors on site than workers!

They are too safe now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I live 12 miles from San Onofre and want the safety bullshit to be reduced!


154 posted on 03/17/2011 8:54:52 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Just wants a reason to shut ‘em down.


155 posted on 03/17/2011 9:26:23 PM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

We have 104 reactors, but how many plants? I figured we had maybe a dozen.


157 posted on 03/17/2011 10:18:31 PM PDT by wastedyears (It has nothing to do with safety, and everything to do with control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: potlatch

159 posted on 03/18/2011 12:21:06 AM PDT by devolve (. . . . . . . . . . . . "- we*ll bring a gun!" . . . . alias Jimmy Qaeda 2 . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian
The 40 year old Nuclear Power Plants in Japan survived an earthquake seven times stronger than their design parameters. That event was followed by a Tsunami.

Despite these unparalleled events, there have been no deaths directly attributed to the failures at the Nuclear Power Plants themselves.

Meanwhile, 14 people were killed in a New York Casino Bus crash last week. Perhaps Obama should initiate a comprehensive review of Buses and Casinos.

It would probably save more lives in the long run than his chicken little witch hunt against the Nuclear Industry in this country.

160 posted on 03/18/2011 12:39:14 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Since Obama Bin Lyin, the Economy Bin Dyin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Scythian

Death toll from tsunami, 16,000+

Death toll from radiation, 0.

Obviously, we must place a moratorium of development of nuclear energy and stick a few hundred bureaucrats up the operators backside.


163 posted on 03/18/2011 6:42:05 AM PDT by IamConservative (Liberalism - the surety of knowing that which cannot be proven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson