Posted on 03/16/2011 2:02:35 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The 9/11 attackers were mostly Saudis. Why not go after them? or why not start a no fly zone in Dharfur?
The attitude of the rebels toward the United States is that they don't understand why we are not helping them. The fact that they are flying the flag of the old pro-US monarchy overthrown by the socialist terrorist Khadafy says alot.
The rebels are supported by America's British, French and Egyptian allies, while Khadafy is supported by our Russian and Chinese enemies as well as rogue states like Cuba, Belarus and Zimbabwe. Islamist Turkey is blocking NATO action.
Practically the whole Arab world wants Khadafy out with the exception of Baathist Syria! Sarah Palin leads and the whole world follows her, while acolytes of the Ron Paul school of foreign policy fret about "why they hate us."
Oh please, I am talking about muslim countries. We killed Christians in Kosovo in favor of muslims.
Now who just got done murdering two servicemen in Germany? Could it be one of those people we fought for? Nah, nothing to see here, move along. Geesh.
It is sad when a person wants someone to be right to the point they are willing to agree that something stupid is aokay.
a majority of Iraqis are glad we intervened.
And can you promise Iraq will not go terrorist Islam if we leave?
You can’t, because when we leave that place will be bad or worse than when Saddam was running things. Iran has a lot of pull there.
Show me a link where the majority of Iraquis are glad we intervened as of now.
In fact, some of them are suing the US for damages.
The 9/11 attackers were mostly Saudis. Why not go after them?
Gaddafi ordered the murder of U.S. citizens.
The ruling S.A. royals did NOT order or participate in 9/11.
And do you know what you said to be absolute fact? Do you really know anything you say is a fact?
I don’t, and you provide no fact.
You're the one stating so-called "facts" that you can't prove.
Roll Tape...
INDYLINDY #36: We leave Iraq or Afghanistan, they go militant Islam. And everyone knows it.
Ironic, isn't it.
More irony from indylindy.
You want me to show you a majority of Iraqis who back my point, meanwhile you demonstrate that only "some" Iraqi's are suing the US.
Anyway, shall I link you to a few polls?
hmm you must have missed the reception Bush got in Kosovo. Kurds love America for the no-fly zone that saved them. they were are strongest Allies in Iraq.
On the Libya crisis, she proposed a no-fly-zone to protect the armed and un-armed opposition to the Qaddafi regime. Mrs. Palin's formulation had been blogged about for nearly a week when it was echoed by the man who, before the Iraq war, had led the Iraq democratic movement in exile, Ahmed Chalabi.Destruction of the mullahcracy in Iran, followed by the annihilation of the Saudi regime, and US administration of the entire oil supply of the gulf -- under the auspices of the UN, but only on paper -- would end world terrorism.
Really?
So then I guess... Neo Con is liberal and libertarian speak for Isolationism....
And "Nation Building" is the same for "don't go after nations that sponsor terrorism" or "do go after those nations but then leave a vacuum in leadership for other terrorists to take over".
______________________________________________
So are the Saudis....would palin go after them?
And how about the rest of the questions? Got any answers?
So are the Saudis....would palin go after them?
Are you aware that most of the Al Qaeda terrorists in S.A. that the US identified were apprehended or killed?
Do you think that Palin would not continue that kind of policy?
Yep - something that used to be considered definitively NOT conservative. This No Fly Zone is crazy talk (it's like McCain & Co re: Kosovo). First you have to eliminate their ability to fly (obliterate infrastructure -- an act of war), then there is that war thing (and trying to figure out what it means to "win"), and then they get to the fun stuff -- rebuilding with oodles of cash with little accountability. And of course, there are those special little business arrangements (like Richard Perle's oil biz in Iraq). Very lucrative -- for some. Very destructive -- for many. Very expensive -- for the US taxpayer.
So far that has been a dismal failure.
Yep, as predicted.
We leave Iraq or Afghanistan, they go militant Islam. And everyone knows it. No more, no less.
You'd think more would learn.
I am surprised at how low the estimate is.
Yes, but they don’t have aircraft carriers. Except for Egypt, where would they fly from? Even from Egypt, they lack the time over targets to enforce a no fly zone.
Palin is awesome and will have my financial support and vote in 2012. I don’t favor a no-fly zone though.
I favor letting them kill one another as long as possible.
There is no ‘good-guy’ in this fight, even if the fundamentalists put a few idealist students up as a front.
Of course, one could argue, a no-fly zone would lead to a longer, bloodier war between a wacky terrorist supporting dictator and fundamentalist terrorist supporting rebels parading around as starry-eyed students committed to a western style democratic republic.
This is an excellent case of where we need to give war a chance.
As with all war? When they are being slaughtered they’ll learn to fly in the dark and rain. We need to stop protecting them and pump the vast resources here at home.
N-i-c-e deconstruction----the connivers are salivating as we type---wetting their pants at the chance to get their greedy hands on even more trillions of US dollars.
God knows how many of these leeches are burrowed deep inside the US govt. They are the real enemy within.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.