Yep - something that used to be considered definitively NOT conservative. This No Fly Zone is crazy talk (it's like McCain & Co re: Kosovo). First you have to eliminate their ability to fly (obliterate infrastructure -- an act of war), then there is that war thing (and trying to figure out what it means to "win"), and then they get to the fun stuff -- rebuilding with oodles of cash with little accountability. And of course, there are those special little business arrangements (like Richard Perle's oil biz in Iraq). Very lucrative -- for some. Very destructive -- for many. Very expensive -- for the US taxpayer.
So far that has been a dismal failure.
Yep, as predicted.
We leave Iraq or Afghanistan, they go militant Islam. And everyone knows it. No more, no less.
You'd think more would learn.
N-i-c-e deconstruction----the connivers are salivating as we type---wetting their pants at the chance to get their greedy hands on even more trillions of US dollars.
God knows how many of these leeches are burrowed deep inside the US govt. They are the real enemy within.
All I have to do is look at who is one of the biggest cheerleaders for a NFZ. Hint: he is from Arizona and crosses the aisle too much. LOL
This is probably where this idea came from.
“All a No Fly Zone is, is neo con speak for nation building.”
...and neo con is nutty buddy speak for people strong on national defense.