Posted on 03/16/2011 2:02:35 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Sorry honey,
Gulf War, Afghanistan, Iraq are the major military engagements of the last few decades.
Unless you are playing “Risk” or “Battleship”, then I suppose you’d have some other evidence to put forward.
You have nothing.
Ahhh... you can’t answer the question so misrepresent the question. How creative. NOT.
In what countries did the neocons WANT to have the military intercede?
The list is much longer.
Thankfully, every action urged by these liberal misfits did not result in “major military engagements” by the U.S.
lol....nutt’n honey
“Mrs. Palin also continues to link America’s energy policy — a realm in which she has experience — and U.S. foreign and anti-terrorism policies. She recognizes that the ongoing transfer of billions of U.S. petro-dollars to unstable or even hostile Mideast regimes has, since the formation in 1973 of the Organization of Petoleum Exporting Countries, been an drain on U.S. financial resources.”
Woohoo! Way to bump the thread in hopes someone doesn’t notice your ignorance.
Good job!
The thread is about Palin...
You’re off the reservation...the PaulBot nuts and conspiracy nuts like you are off topic...I think you’ve hijacked the thread quite enough.
In lieu of that...
“Mrs. Palin laid out how the president’s “war on domestic oil and gas exploration and production has caused us pain at the pump, endangered our already sluggish economic recovery, and threatened our national security.” Nor is Gov. Palin’s insight into complex international issues limited to areas of her immediate expertise.”
You do know that Richard Perle wrote that in the neos WH Office of Special Plans organization bylaws.
"Just so happened" that got him billions in start-up costs for his ME oil business using US tax dollars.
Shucks, Perle and his cronies never did release the list of ME countries they wanted the US to invade (/snix).
Yep. And she's sounding more and more like a mouthpiece for Kristol and his neocon minions. I made a comment about her call for a "no fly zone" to which you responded, trying to support your contention that neocons are strong on "national defense." That you can't acknowledge their true agenda, despite decades of writings and policy positions, is not my fault.
You’re off the reservation...the PaulBot nuts and conspiracy nuts like you are off topic...
I'm not a PaulBot, nor a nut. I'm a conservative. When folks promote ideologies that are definitively NOT conservative, don't expect me to support it.
You do know that Richard Perle wrote that in the neos WH Office of Special Plans organization bylaws. "Just so happened" that got him billions in start-up costs for his ME oil business using US tax dollars.
No, I didn't know that. But it doesn't surprise me.
Shucks, Perle and his cronies never did release the list of ME countries they wanted the US to invade (/snix).
LOL. Yeah -- they only wrote about it in every op-ed, letters to Presidents and policy papers published by one of their many "foundations" for the last three decades. But since they don't have an ongoing published list, I guess it never happened. /s
“The Washington Post’s Jennifer Rubin — certainly no knee-jerk advocate for Sarah Palin — wrote just a few weeks ago that Palin turns out to have been correct in the prediction she made to Barbara Walters, in a much-noted November 2009 interview. Palin stated she was opposed to Obama’s opposition to Israel’s settlement policies because “[m]ore and more Jewish people will be flocking to Israel in the days and weeks and months ahead.” Now, as Rubin noted, Israel’s Central Bureau of Statistics confirms that the pace of immigration to Israel rose 14% to 16,633 from the level in 2009, most coming from Russia or America.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.