Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USAF Pulls Funding For F-15 IRST Upgrade
AviationWeek.com ^ | Mar 15, 2011 | Amy Butler

Posted on 03/15/2011 8:27:56 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

USAF Pulls Funding For F-15 IRST Upgrade

Mar 15, 2011

The U.S. Air Force has terminated funding for an infrared search and track (IRST) upgrade for its F-15C/D fleet as part of the service’s push last year to produce savings for the Pentagon’s fiscal 2012 budget.

Air Force officials say that the effort was designed to provide “the only USAF search and targeting capability in the infrared spectrum designed specifically for air-to-air, providing air-to-air attack capability in a radar-denied environment on the F-15C/D.” The system could be useful for air-to-air fighter engagements as well as cruise missile targeting and ballistic missile early warning. Lockheed Martin provides the sensor for the pod.

However, the service opted to remove research and development funding for the program in fiscal 2012 and beyond, according to Air Force officials. In the budget, they propose pulling $34.9 million in fiscal 2012 and a total of $345 million across the future year defense plan (including 2012).

Boeing, which is the prime contractor for the F-15, says that it continues to work with the Air Force to “explore options” for the program.

Air Force officials cite “technical challenges” with the F-15 version as their rationale. However, they also say that a version of the IRST designed for the Navy is “behind schedule.”

Navy officials, however, say that the effort is proceeding as planned. “The Navy’s F/A-18 IRST program is meeting program cost and schedule requirements,” says Marcia Hart-Wise, a spokeswoman for the service’s Super Hornet program.

The Navy version is ahead of that planned for the F-15 in its programmatic schedule. Because the Navy’s deliveries of F-35s come later than the Air Force’s and because its fleet of Super Hornets must remain operationally relevant longer than some Air Force legacy fighters, the service is spending money on its F/A-18E/Fs to keep them in the fight. One industry official notes that the use of an IRST is required because radars run the risk of being jammed at critical moments. The Navy is still buying Super Hornets and plans to buy an additional 41 aircraft owing to delays in the F-35 schedule.

The Super Hornet IRST system is mounted on the front of a 400-gal. centerline fuselage fuel tank.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; f15; irst; lockheedmartin

1 posted on 03/15/2011 8:28:01 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Bummer. Now you’ll still have to turn your radar emitter on (like turning on a searchlight at night) or get targeting info from an E-3.

This limits independent patrolling.


2 posted on 03/15/2011 8:36:56 PM PDT by Darteaus94025
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darteaus94025

Yeah, radiate or use the mark-1 eyeball...sigh


3 posted on 03/15/2011 8:58:16 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Hmm.. I wonder why the Navy program is deemed to be
‘on schedule’ whilst the USAF version is not?

More rigorous application of Earned Value?


4 posted on 03/15/2011 10:33:35 PM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darteaus94025; ThunderSleeps

Well.. If you don’t start making significant cuts in defense and entitlements, you won’t even scratch the deficit.

Defense spending and entitlements are a HUGE portion of the budget. The defense industry needs a rude reminder that its NOT sacred.

I go to church with some defense engineering types
and they have, apparently, no worries about the economy or the prospect of that business dropping. They are buying new cars and taking spring break trips to go skiing.

I feel bad saying it, but if they got pink slips next week, I prolly wouldn’t care. I would, of course, be sympathetic to their face.

I’m just sick of the government gravy train and all the defense contractors wiping the gravy off their chins.

Sorry. I’m just in the mood to rant.


5 posted on 03/15/2011 10:47:01 PM PDT by NeverForgetBataan (To the German Commander: ..........................NUTS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“Air Force officials say that the effort was designed to provide “the only USAF search and targeting capability in the infrared spectrum designed specifically for air-to-air, providing air-to-air attack capability in a radar-denied environment”

I might be talking about a horse of a completely different color here, but haven’t the Russians included such a system on the Fulcrum and Flanker since the late 1980s?


6 posted on 03/16/2011 12:14:56 AM PDT by DemforBush (With a Bocephus sticker on his 442, he'd light 'em up just for fun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeverForgetBataan
We have 3 choices.
1. Cede air superiority. The lessons of 80 years of combat dictate that this is madness.
2. Upgrade our current air fleet, as we slowly introduce the F-35 and F/A-22.
3. Build large numbers of F/A-22s.

Which of these is cheapest?

7 posted on 03/16/2011 12:46:40 AM PDT by rmlew (You want change? Vote for the most conservative electable in your state or district.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

Yes, so did the USN use such a system for the Tomcat. The three main ‘Euro-Canard’ fighters also have IRST in service or development.


8 posted on 03/16/2011 2:41:16 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The LANTIRN AN/AAQ-14 targeting pod still includes an air-to-air IRST mode. It just isn’t a “dedicated air-to-air IRST” solution.


9 posted on 03/16/2011 5:01:36 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson