Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/15/2011 8:28:01 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki

Bummer. Now you’ll still have to turn your radar emitter on (like turning on a searchlight at night) or get targeting info from an E-3.

This limits independent patrolling.


2 posted on 03/15/2011 8:36:56 PM PDT by Darteaus94025
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Hmm.. I wonder why the Navy program is deemed to be
‘on schedule’ whilst the USAF version is not?

More rigorous application of Earned Value?


4 posted on 03/15/2011 10:33:35 PM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“Air Force officials say that the effort was designed to provide “the only USAF search and targeting capability in the infrared spectrum designed specifically for air-to-air, providing air-to-air attack capability in a radar-denied environment”

I might be talking about a horse of a completely different color here, but haven’t the Russians included such a system on the Fulcrum and Flanker since the late 1980s?


6 posted on 03/16/2011 12:14:56 AM PDT by DemforBush (With a Bocephus sticker on his 442, he'd light 'em up just for fun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The LANTIRN AN/AAQ-14 targeting pod still includes an air-to-air IRST mode. It just isn’t a “dedicated air-to-air IRST” solution.


9 posted on 03/16/2011 5:01:36 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson