Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SteveH

Good blog at New Scientist here:

http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2011/03/nuclear-crisis-radioactive-fue.html

Worried about SFP at dai-ichi #4, “recriticality” which the blog points out should not have happened.

Kyodonews on recriticality at dai-ichi #4:

http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2011/03/78393.html

I am not certain how TEPCO could have been allowed to store fuel rods in the SFPs in such a manner as to permit recriticality under any conceivable circumstances...


1,518 posted on 03/17/2011 3:25:55 PM PDT by SteveH (First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1499 | View Replies ]


To: SteveH
this is so sad..you think it is rice they are fighting over each other for..guess again


imagine what it would be like in the US.
1,520 posted on 03/17/2011 3:41:38 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1518 | View Replies ]

To: SteveH
''The possibility of recriticality is not zero,''

Man, is this a cya statement or what????

1,522 posted on 03/17/2011 3:42:17 PM PDT by HeartlandOfAmerica (Insane, Corrupt Democrats or Stupid, Spinless Republicans - Pick America's poison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1518 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson