Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fukushima Nuclear Accident: A simple and accurate explanation
BraveNewClimate ^ | 3/13/2011 | Barry Brook

Posted on 03/13/2011 5:26:08 PM PDT by Scutter

Along with reliable sources such as the IAEA and WNN updates, there is an incredible amount of misinformation and hyperbole flying around the internet and media right now about the Fukushima nuclear reactor situation. In the BNC post Discussion Thread – Japanese nuclear reactors and the 11 March 2011 earthquake (and in the many comments that attend the top post), a lot of technical detail is provided, as well as regular updates. But what about a layman’s summary? How do most people get a grasp on what is happening, why, and what the consequences will be?

Below I reproduce a summary on the situation prepared by Dr Josef Oehmen, a research scientist at MIT, in Boston. He is a PhD Scientist, whose father has extensive experience in Germany’s nuclear industry. This was first posted by Jason Morgan earlier this evening, and he has kindly allowed me to reproduce it here. I think it is very important that this information be widely understood.

Please also take the time to read this: An informed public is key to acceptance of nuclear energy — it was never more relevant than now.

Click here to read the entire article

(Excerpt) Read more at bravenewclimate.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: earthquake; fukushima; japan; nuclear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
This should be mandatory reading for the folks here posting gloom and doom fallout scenarios for the US. This is an extremely cogent, accurate, and hype-free analysis of the Fukushima situation.
1 posted on 03/13/2011 5:26:17 PM PDT by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scutter

Let’ see.

THERE WAS AN EARTHQUAKE, SEE?

NO ONE IS IN ANY DANGER EXCEPT THEY CAN’T TURN ON THE LIGHTS IS ALL.


2 posted on 03/13/2011 5:28:08 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scutter

“He is a PhD Scientist, whose father has extensive experience in Germany’s nuclear industry.”

Good, let’s hear from the father.


3 posted on 03/13/2011 5:30:09 PM PDT by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scutter

“...and hype-free analysis of the Fukushima situation.”

By an economist.


4 posted on 03/13/2011 5:32:48 PM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scutter

This is all kinda funny. I hate to tell them but Chernobyl was not even in the same league as these reactors. It was so bad (typical Soviet construction crap) it was made out of Chinese drywall.


5 posted on 03/13/2011 5:34:47 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (The last Democrat worth a damn was Stalin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scutter

Agreed. There’s been a lot of crap posted, on FR and everywhere. When it’s obvious that no one has true knowledge of a developing situation the prudent thing to do is sit tight and not pass along crap info, but that doesn’t compute for some.


6 posted on 03/13/2011 5:44:12 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

It is funny. Notice how quick the panic-stricken morons were to jump on this thread.


7 posted on 03/13/2011 5:46:01 PM PDT by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

So far from being like Chernobyl that the name shouldn’t even be used. Chernobyl burned for days before the Russians acknowledged a problem. It dumped tons of radioactive particulate matter into the air which is what fallout is.


8 posted on 03/13/2011 5:51:24 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Scutter

This is the first one thats made sense.


9 posted on 03/13/2011 5:51:29 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
LOL!


10 posted on 03/13/2011 5:52:38 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Scutter

Why I am not worried about Japan’s nuclear reactors
Morgsatlarge ^ | 3/13/2011 | Dr. Josef Oehmen (M.I.T.)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2688108/posts


11 posted on 03/13/2011 5:53:33 PM PDT by EBH ( Whether you eat your bread or see it vanish into a looter's stomach, is an absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scutter
This should be mandatory reading for the folks here posting gloom and doom fallout scenarios for the US. This is an extremely cogent, accurate, and hype-free analysis of the Fukushima situation.

Yes, a great article (I read it on another thread this morning.

Thanks for posting. BTTT!

12 posted on 03/13/2011 5:55:47 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scutter
Thank you for the post, Scutter.
13 posted on 03/13/2011 5:58:28 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scutter

I have a question - regarding the conumbrum about I-131 - potassium iodide that people stock up on in the event of a nuclear accident near them - per this link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_iodine

and yet - it’supposedly report “estimated that more than half the iodine-131 from Chernobyl [which increases the risk of thyroid cancer] was deposited outside the former Soviet Union


14 posted on 03/13/2011 6:00:52 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("We stand together or we fall apart" mt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Same analysis, on a different site. I did search for dupes, but as usual the article search here failed to find it.


15 posted on 03/13/2011 6:01:14 PM PDT by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Scutter

Good find.


16 posted on 03/13/2011 6:02:10 PM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

I think the main problem in Russia was the massive fire and explosion. This lead to radioactive smoke and dust. Not a simple gas release.


17 posted on 03/13/2011 6:02:48 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

That is just part of it. Chernobyl went boom...

The only thing that has happened is the outer containment had a H2 blowout. And some would point out ...it is designed to do that... The contamination will be minimal.

Second, all this talk about design. It was is a 40 year old design. I don’t think we can design for greater than a 7.0...and a tsunami... FORTY YEARS AGO.

These reactors are doing a slow, fairly controlled cool down. All indications are all the reactors were scrammed and the only thing happening is needing to keep stuff cool.


18 posted on 03/13/2011 6:03:56 PM PDT by EBH ( Whether you eat your bread or see it vanish into a looter's stomach, is an absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Scutter

Commendations for posting this fact-based, non-hysteria inducing article, Scutter. We need more posts like this on the forum right now, and less hyperventilating.

FR should be a counter-balance to the corrupt and irresponsible MSM, not a counterpart.


19 posted on 03/13/2011 6:06:56 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scutter
It is unclear, Scutter, to what extent we can realy on this analysis. Its author, Dr. Josef Oehmen, appears to specialize in a narrow area of business administration, which has nothing to do with either physics or nuclear engineering. His publications I could find deal with risks in supply chains and with new profuct development --- two traditional areas of marketing.

He may have distributed his father's analysis. As it stands, its reliability is unclear.

20 posted on 03/13/2011 6:07:24 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson