I am not going to discount it because it happened to fall between the two windows.
You can’t be exact when it comes to Mother Nature.
Just curious, did the seismologists predict there would be a major event in March before the rumblings showed up on their machines?
I would say Nolle gave a better warning than the seismologists.
So, a prediction that fails to match with events, a prediction worldwide in nature and not specific to anywhere, is not discounted?
You can’t be exact when it comes to Mother Nature.
So Nolle's eight day window covering the entire planet fails, and the excuse is you can't exactly predict something?
Just curious, did the seismologists predict there would be a major event in March before the rumblings showed up on their machines?
A one in one hundred chance that the 7.2 earthquake on March 9th off the Honshu region would be a precursor to a much larger event within 72 hours of the initial event. A seismic hazard map published 12 years ago identifying the Honshu region as having a ten percent chance of experiencing nearly 4 destructive earthquake events over a fifty year timespan. A tsunami hazard map identifying the Honshu region as being particularly susceptible to tsunamis, and historical records indicating that massive tsunamis have occurred in the region in the past.
So, the seismologists identified a hundred mile region where a major seismic event could happen within a 72 hour period, as well as previously published cautions about tsunami dangers in the area. A specific area, a specific time frame, where you've already granted that mother nature is difficult to predict, and supposedly a generalized warning for the entire world that ended two days before the 7.2 and four days before the 8.9 is somehow more accurate?
I would say Nolle gave a better warning than the seismologists.
And I'd have to say that his predictions are worthless ramblings of an astrologist.