Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Backpedals From Military Action on Libya
AOL News ^ | Mar 9, 2011 – 2:34 PM | Joseph Schuman Joseph Schuman Senior Correspondent

Posted on 03/09/2011 11:59:08 AM PST by Red Badger

The Obama administration today stepped back from the prospect of imminent U.S. military action to support rebel forces in Libya, voicing reluctance to enforce a no-fly zone without United Nations approval.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, CIA Director Leon Panetta and other national security "principals" were meeting in the White House situation room to discuss administration options for Libya.

But Obama had no plans to attend, and press secretary Jay Carney repeatedly made clear that this is "not a decision meeting."

"I don't want to raise expectations that this is a meeting that will lead to imminent, concrete action," Carney said.

Pressure to act has increased amid reports that forces loyal to dictator Moammar Gadhafi are gaining the upper hand on rebels -- thanks in part to aerial bombardment of rebel-held cities that has claimed an unknown number of civilian lives. Both Republicans and more hawkish Democrats have been calling on the White House to follow up on Obama's comments Monday that he is considering military options.

But in an interview on CBS, Clinton noted that the British and French planned to introduce a draft U.N. Security Council resolution authorizing international action, and said, "We think it's very important that there be a U.N. decision on whatever might be done."

She added: "There is still a lot of opposition, as you probably know, within the Security Council."

Asked later if the administration would consider joining an effort to enforce a no-fly zone without a U.N. imprimatur, Carney declined to give a clear answer. Instead, he repeatedly said that "it is our strong preference that the action we take be done with our international partners" and that it's important to work with the U.N.

Russia and China, both permanent Security Council members that wield a veto, have suggested they are likely to oppose approval of a no-fly zone.

The possibility of a decision by NATO countries to step in without a U.N. resolution also appeared increasingly unlikely, in part because NATO member Turkey has suggested it won't back such an effort. Major NATO decisions require a unanimous vote by the alliance's member states.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates arrived in Brussels late today to discuss Libya with fellow NATO defense ministers this week, but there was no indication he expected to leave with a new plan.

Both Clinton and Carney suggested the administration fears how solely Western intervention might be perceived in the Arab world.

Sponsored Links "We believe it's important that this not be an American or a NATO or a European effort," Clinton said. "We think it's important that there be international support and that there be a broad acceptance by the international community, particularly the Arab world, that something needs to be done on behalf of the opposition in Libya."

Sounding a bit on the defensive, Carney noted the administration has already enacted financial sanctions against Gadhafi's regime, coordinated humanitarian efforts for refugees fleeing the fighting and positioned Navy ships and other resources in the region as it plans for military contingencies.

But he suggested the world shouldn't hold its breath for the next step.

"The actions we have taken have been dramatic," he said, "and we are implementing them in a way we hope will have an effect."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: 201103; 20110309; libya; noflyzone; oup; russia; russianpilots; russians; un; unapproval
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 03/09/2011 11:59:11 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

"he'll huff and he'll puff and fly off to campaign and throw Moochell another lobster"

2 posted on 03/09/2011 12:03:32 PM PST by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

They know Russia will veto any no-fly zone resolution.


3 posted on 03/09/2011 12:04:27 PM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AU72

As well as China..........


4 posted on 03/09/2011 12:05:01 PM PST by Red Badger (How can anyone look at the situation in Libya and be for gun control is beyond stupid. It's suicide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Here he goes again flip flop - flip flop. The muslims in Egypt know Obama well. he will continue to flip flop. That is how he operates - indecisive and votes - present.


5 posted on 03/09/2011 12:06:47 PM PST by hondact200 (Candor dat viribos alas (sincerity gives wings to strength) and Nil desperandum (never despair))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, CIA Director Leon Panetta and other national security "principals" were meeting in the White House situation room. . . .

But Obama had no plans to attend, and press secretary Jay Carney repeatedly made clear that this is "not a decision meeting."

Actually, they're planning to listen to a rap concert and play cards.

6 posted on 03/09/2011 12:07:39 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Omaba had coined a phrase for this kind of bait-n-switch or back peddal.

Okie-Doke

This is Obama Okie-Doke #269.

Or is it 270, I lost count.


7 posted on 03/09/2011 12:07:45 PM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Meaning when Obama flip flopped in Egypt he is doing the same here in Libya.


8 posted on 03/09/2011 12:09:36 PM PST by hondact200 (Candor dat viribos alas (sincerity gives wings to strength) and Nil desperandum (never despair))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Does anyone even really know who is backing the rebels? I wouldn’t want my kid risking his life over their for either side.


9 posted on 03/09/2011 12:09:47 PM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
But Obama had no plans to attend...

National security in the Obama WH.

Could we send some more mixed signals?

10 posted on 03/09/2011 12:11:25 PM PST by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
"Actually, they're planning to listen to a rap concert and play cards"

I'm sure we will hear media criticism of this any minute now. The NYT is on this like a lazer.

11 posted on 03/09/2011 12:17:49 PM PST by lormand (A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mojito
But Obama had no plans to attend...

Dude. He's got a year and 10 months tops of the sweetest free ride in the known universe. he ain't wasting that sitting around with Hildabeest and Pannetta in some stinkin stuffy situation room.

12 posted on 03/09/2011 12:19:57 PM PST by Calusa (The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles. Quoth Bob Dylan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Putin will call Obama when he needs his shoes shined again.

As will Hu.

13 posted on 03/09/2011 12:22:57 PM PST by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, CIA Director Leon Panetta and other national security "principals" were meeting in the White House situation room to discuss administration options for Libya.

Socialists consider talking about something the same as doing something. If zero wasn't in campaign mode right now, the media wouldn't even discuss this.

14 posted on 03/09/2011 12:23:15 PM PST by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BerryDingle

Apparently their trial balloon didn’t fly, or the focus groups were not amused.............


15 posted on 03/09/2011 12:25:30 PM PST by Red Badger (How can anyone look at the situation in Libya and be for gun control is beyond stupid. It's suicide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Amazing. The clowns in this administration just cannot put together a coherent message and policy. It would be funny if it weren’t such a dangerous world.


16 posted on 03/09/2011 12:25:53 PM PST by Buckeye Battle Cry ("I've got tiger blood and Adonis DNA!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

I’m against a no-fly zone. I would prefer the USAF destroy the Libyan AF on the ground, and then leave.


17 posted on 03/09/2011 12:30:20 PM PST by Judges Gone Wild (Who are these uncircumcised to oppose the armies of the Living God?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AU72

FWIW according to Al Jazeera and CNN many of Gadhafi’s pilots are Russian.


18 posted on 03/09/2011 12:42:18 PM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

Anything to keep the instability going longer and longer, increasing the oil price per barrel more and more - So when gasoline gets to 5-6 $$ per gallon, his green energy might begin to look more cost effective.

1-term-wonder!


19 posted on 03/09/2011 12:46:51 PM PST by OldGuard (Conservatives - Saving the planet since 1860)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Whats with all of the head folks meeting on Libya and Bama boy not attending. Does he think that will give him deniability, is this his way of voting Present without being present, or does he simply realize that he has nothing of merit to submit at this meeting anyway.

I guess he picks and chooses his times to be President.

What a mess we have with this Hybrid in charge.


20 posted on 03/09/2011 1:23:40 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson