Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NEW YORK PLANS GUN REGISTRATION
boblonsberry.com ^ | 03/03/11 | Bob Lonsberry

Posted on 03/03/2011 7:04:23 AM PST by shortstop

First they came for our bicycles.

Now they’ve come for our guns.

One day after word leaked of a New York State plan to require license plates and annual fees for bicycles, information has gotten out about pending legislation that would register and attach a fee to every firearm in the state.

Already one of the most anti-gun states in the country, New York’s move would all but nullify the Second Amendment.

At issue is Senate Bill 2994, which is linked in its entirety at the bottom of this column. It would require every gun owner in the state to make a list of their firearms, to include make, description and serial number, and file that list with the county clerk.

Further, gun owners would have to specify where in their homes each of their firearms were stored when not in use.

And there would be a $25 fee charged for each gun – which would have to be renewed annually at a cost of $10 each gun.

Firearms owners would be issued a photo ID listing the guns registered to their name.

If a gun was sold, swapped or stolen, that information would have to be filed with the clerk.

Failure to obey any particular of the proposed law would be a misdemeanor.

Why do they want to do this?

Here’s what a memo from the sponsor says: “Through the use of an annual firearm registration, we are able to have better tracking supervision of the firearms circulating in New York State. There are many firearms that are illegally possessed in New York State but by implementing a constant registry of firearms we can come a step closer to identifying those illegal firearms. Also with this annual registration of firearms, firearm owners are better protected by law if the firearm is stolen or lost and something unfortunately happens with their particular firearm.”

Better tracking supervision of the firearms circulating in New York?

Is it the government’s business to track or supervise the firearms in the state?

Notice that this bill isn’t just about handguns – which are already registered in the state – it is about all guns. That means family heirlooms and hunting guns are also subject to registration, and expensive ownership fees.

Registration is the foreplay of confiscation, and this piece of legislation would put the physical location of every legal gun in the state at the touch of the government’s finger. The government would know who had guns and where they kept them.

And so too, presumably, would anyone who filed a freedom of information request. New York has already held that its pistol permits – which include personal information as well as a list of handguns owned – are public records. This new list of guns and gun owners would also be a public record.

Which means the bad guys have just learned where every gun is. That tells them what houses are unprotected, that tells them what houses they should burglarize.

And with the list of where each gun is stored, it will make burglary all the easier.

This bill is an assault on freedom, a disrespect to the Second Amendment, and a perfect illustration of the burden of oppression New Yorkers suffer under. It is part of the ongoing enshackling of the American people.

It is the insane perspective of big-city liberals, this is a good thing. This is a play to a progressive constituency which is intolerant of any perspective other than its own.

Prospects for passage are uncertain.

New York’s governor is an anti-gun Democrat. New York’s Assembly is controlled by anti-gun Democrats. New York’s Senate is controlled by Republicans. But they have a one-vote margin, and – it being New York – some of them are anti-gun.

So this bill has a fair chance of becoming law.

Which means a test of how much people will take might be coming.

Because this is none of the government’s business. Gun ownership should not be subject to an annual fee. Gun registration is un-American. Carrying around a photo ID to prove you’ve registered your deer gun is offensive.

And many New Yorkers won’t take it.

This may be the one that drives the law-abiding into law-breaking.

Because my guns are none of the government’s business. And where I keep them is none of the government’s business. And I’m not going to pay an annual fee to exercise a constitutional right.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2evil4words; banglist; cw2; gungrabbers; jbts; lonsberry; newyork
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
I'll bet the boyz in the hood will be first in line to register their guns for fear by being hit with a misdemeanor.
1 posted on 03/03/2011 7:04:25 AM PST by shortstop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shortstop
Holy Mother-Of-God CRAP.

I am SO f***ing happy I left that bottom-feeder of a state.

2 posted on 03/03/2011 7:06:36 AM PST by Lazamataz (Scott Walker: Please FIRE.... then APPOINT... then VOTE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

Pffft... patently UnConstitutional.


3 posted on 03/03/2011 7:08:09 AM PST by Obadiah (If you were going to shoot a mime, would you use a silencer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
"family heirlooms"

I think guns mfg before 1898 are not considered firearms.

Just one more reason to move out'a Dodge.

4 posted on 03/03/2011 7:10:41 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

Cue up the NRA...


5 posted on 03/03/2011 7:10:43 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
"There are many firearms that are illegally possessed in New York State but by implementing a constant registry of firearms we can come a step closer to identifying those illegal firearms."

NO - IT WON'T

6 posted on 03/03/2011 7:11:34 AM PST by smokingfrog ( BORN free - taxed to DEATH (and beyond) ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

NY arguably the worst anti-gun anti-self defense sh!thole in the US. NY needs to be given to Quebec killing two birds with one stone. Getting rid on NC and sticking it to Quebec.


7 posted on 03/03/2011 7:11:34 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
NEW YORK PLANS GUN REGISTRATION

it should say

NEW YORK PLANS Illegal Alien REGISTRATION

8 posted on 03/03/2011 7:12:29 AM PST by STD (Love Your God, Love Your Neighbor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

We should swap out all of New England for Alberta.


9 posted on 03/03/2011 7:13:02 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

Who in their right mind would live in New York.


10 posted on 03/03/2011 7:13:16 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
This may be the one that drives the law-abiding into law-breaking.

see tag

11 posted on 03/03/2011 7:13:45 AM PST by Roccus (Pass enough laws and EVERYONE becomes a law breaker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

mostly works for me, but VT and NH aren’t too bad.


12 posted on 03/03/2011 7:14:37 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

New York needs more Detroit experience.


13 posted on 03/03/2011 7:15:19 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
There are many firearms that are illegally possessed in New York State but by implementing
a constant registry of firearms we can come a step closer to identifying those illegal firearms.

Words fail me. We're feckin' doomed.
14 posted on 03/03/2011 7:15:23 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

Who in their right mind would even go there to visit and spend money there?


15 posted on 03/03/2011 7:15:45 AM PST by basil (It's time to rid the country of "gun free zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

“Who in their right mind would live in New York.”

My 65 year old father in Upstate NY.

He says he’ll be the last conservative standing and will not be driven from his home.

The man’s a fighter.


16 posted on 03/03/2011 7:16:34 AM PST by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

I’ve been asking that question of myself a lot lately.


17 posted on 03/03/2011 7:16:36 AM PST by NoKoolAidforMe (1-20-09--The Beginning of an Error..............1-20-13--Change we can look forward to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
Who in their right mind would live in New York.

Would you believe that a New Yorker implied that I was crazy for calling NY an anti-self defense s**thole. I don't remember who.

18 posted on 03/03/2011 7:17:32 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
From the web:

"Although your State and local laws may vary, any firearm with a frame or receiver that actually made before Jan. 1, 1899 is legally "antique" and not considered a "firearm" under Federal law. This refers to the actual date of manufacture of the receiver/frame, not just model year or patent date marked. (For example, only ***low serial number*** Winchester Model 1894 lever actions are actually antique.) No FFL is required to buy or sell antiques across state lines. They are in the same legal category as a muzzle loading replica. I regularly ship them right to people's doorstep via UPS, with no "paper trail." Think of it as the last bastion of gun ownership and transfer privacy. "

19 posted on 03/03/2011 7:18:11 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
“Did you really think we want those laws observed?” said Dr. Ferris. “We want them to be broken. You’d better get it straight that it’s not a bunch of boy scouts you’re up against... We’re after power and we mean it... There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that’s the system, Mr. Reardon, that’s the game, and once you understand it, you’ll be much easier to deal with.” - Ayn Rand, ‘Atlas Shrugged’ 1957

L

20 posted on 03/03/2011 7:21:05 AM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson