Posted on 03/01/2011 11:11:45 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
State Rep. Mark Hatfield, R-Waycross, just handed me a copy of his new bill, HB 401, which would require President Barack Obama to provide certified proof of his birth to the Georgia secretary of state in order to appear on next years presidential primary and general election ballots.
The bill has the signatures of 94 members of the 180-member House, including that of one Democrat, Glenn Baker of Jonesboro.
The measure will get its first hearing on Wednesday. Read the bill here.
If youre a member of the Georgia Ports Authority or Georgia Chamber of Commerce, still attempting to persuade the White House to add a few zeros to that appropriation for the dredging of the Port of Savannah, this is your cue to cut loose an animal howl of frustration.
At minimum, the bill will make for some interesting chatter when the national press comes down to hear Newt Gingrichs announcement that hes exploring a GOP run for president.
Hatfield attempted similar legislation last year. From my AJC colleague April Hunt:
I think the issue with our sitting president has been left unresolved for a significant length of time that people have concerns, Hatfield said. But this is not just about our current president. Its about enforcing the constitutional provisions for anyone who seeks the office of presidency.
Hatfields bill would require certified copies of the candidates first original long-form birth certificate. Documentation as provided by Hawaii, which has insisted time and time again that Obama was born there, would not suffice, Hatfield said.....
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.ajc.com ...
www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-9.pdf
i-9 employment eligibility verification form
I called my reps no one had an answer.
Everyone except his fellow toadying 0h0m0 suckups and hirelings.
Found one! ;-)
The following is from “The Right Side of Life” a pro-Obama is ineligible blog and the reference is to a footnote in a Motion to Dismiss submitted by the defense in the original Hollister v Soetoro lawsuit.
“I just received a copy of the Motion to Dismiss in Philip Bergs recent case, Hollister v. Soetoro. Aside from the usual defensive arguments, the following footnotes are very telling:
Regarding Bergs claim of ineligibility:
1 President Obama has publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu Hawaii. See, e.g., Factcheck.org, Born in the U.S.A.: The truth about Obamas birth certificate, available at http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html (concluding that the birth certificate is genuine, and noting a contemporaneous birth announcement published in a Honolulu newspaper). Hawaii officials have publicly verified that they have President Obamas original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures. See Certified, Honolulu Star Bulletin, Oct. 31, 2008. This Court can take judicial notice of these public news reports. See The Washington Post v. Robinson, 935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80, 81 n.1, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1980).”
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2009/01/29/hollister-v-soetoro-defendant-motion-to-dismiss/
Thanks bitt for the pointer, and thanks butterdezillion for the rant.
These are times of rapid change.
Butter. Yet again, thanks for the solid case posted as to why the kenyan simply could be eligible for the POTUS. One thing not enough of us mention is the fact that Pelosi was most instrumental in signing off on the two different DNC documents. She should end up in prison eventually. But that is for another day in the future. Getting late at my end so do both have a great upcoming day.
"...I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school..."
So...he says he has it.
Reading this tripe he supposedly wrote is like water torture, worse than reading Alinsky's Rules For Radicals.
"...I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school..."
So...he says he has it.
Reading this tripe he supposedly wrote is like water torture, worse than reading Alinsky's Rules For Radicals.
That can't be said often enough. The Site Pest has worn out his welcome. Sooner or later he will rub the wrong person the wrong way and it will be zot time. Till then, he is an annoyance who just can't seem to comprehend that no one wants him around.
When did White House Counsel, Robert F. Bauer become a judge? Wouldn’t that be a conflict of interest?
That can’t be said often enough. The Site Pest has worn out his welcome. Sooner or later he will rub the wrong person the wrong way and it will be zot time. Till then, he is an annoyance who just can’t seem to comprehend that no one wants him around.
This Court can take judicial notice of these public news reports.
It doens’t mean squat requesting judicial notice of an item not subject to judicial notice is just plain BS.
If it meant anything plaintiff’s could request the judge take judicial notice of the public news reports stating Obama was born in Kenya or Indonesia.
Thanks for the ping!
The only requirement that Nebraska currently has for a name getting on the Presidential ballot is the word of the DNC or RNC certifiers. The constitutionality of the election for the whole State of Nebraska depends on somebody who would wipe her a$$ with the Constitution if she thought it would serve her purposes.
If anybody has any questions of whether Nebraska’s election law needs to be changed they need look no farther than that simple fact.
I was thinking about how much Terry Lakin was willing to give monetarily just for the ability to look himself in the mirror each day knowing that he did everything in his power to protect and defend the US Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic, as he swore to do. I don’t know how much he made but if he had even 10 more years of military service left that would be at least a million dollars in lost wages, probably another million in lost retirement benefits, the $800,000 of his own personal savings, and I don’t know how much in health/medical benefits etc. I’d say 3 million is probably on the low end for an estimate.
Regardless of what anybody thinks about the wisdom of what Lakin did, I think any one of us has to respect a person who considers their own oath worth at least $3 million of their own money to be able to say in good conscience they kept the oath.
EVERY YEAR for the last 25 years Nancy Pelosi has made that same oath:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God. “
And to keep that oath she - one of the richest members of Congress - not only wouldn’t put her money where her mouth is, but in all her travels using military escort and drinking lots of booze on the taxpayer dime she couldn’t even muster up the guts to tell Barack Obama to stuff it unless he agreed to let her see his legal documentation.
Pelosi is the media’s beloved queen, and Lakin sits in jail. It makes me physically ill.
I have a photo of Lakin and his family on my refrigerator and I pray for them every day. They’re going to be fine, whatever comes, just because of who they are. The one I probably should have on my refrigerator door is Pelosi, and pray every day for her repentance before it’s too late.
Thanks for the ping, bitt. It was a great rant!
Thanks for the ping, bitt. It was a great rant!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.