Posted on 02/24/2011 11:11:03 AM PST by spunkets
"12:09 p.m.: Another key exchange:
FAKE KOCH: What we were thinking about the crowds was, planting some troublemakers.
WALKER: We thought about that. My only gut reaction to that would be, right now, the lawmakers I talk to have just completely had it with them. The public is not really fond of this. The teachers union did some polling and focus groups... "
(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...
The problem is that Walker failed to recognize and immediately distance himself from any hint of a conspiracy to employ troublemakers as a tool in this matter. That is not a meaningless matter.
He sinned "Christian" and so have you for dismissing and promoting deceit!
“He sinned “Christian” and so have you for dismissing and promoting deceit!”
You don’t know what those words mean.
No, I think he misunderstood the caller. He thought they were referring to the protesters as troublemakers (which they are).
Morally reprehensible deceitful actions are almost inevitably counter productive. What is your real beef with Walker?
If you look at funding for the last election cycle, most of the top 20 campaign contributors were....labor unions who gave money to the Democrats, while Koch Industries ranked at....number 83 on the list!
http://maroonedinmarin.blogspot.com/2011/02/democrat-supporting-labor-unions-lead.html
“FAKE KOCH: What we were thinking about the crowds was, planting some troublemakers.
WALKER: We thought about that.”
Screw you, Walker.
No, he did not misunderstand the caller. If so, he could have clarified that in the press conference about it. Instead he verified that the idea was entertained— and rejected. Part of the problem is that, according to the call, it wasn’t rejected due to public safety concerns, nor was it rejected because he found it morally reprehensible. It was rejected because he thought violence had the potential to weaken his political position.
This is the message that is going out. You can read more here:
Screw you, chessplayer. Go back to DU, RAT troll.
So Walker said he WOULDN’T send in troublemakers and you’re blaming him for that? That’s the sort of twisted, lying, leftist logic usually found on MSNBC.
So this governor told the truth to a liar? Shame shame shame.
I take issue with it being called a “prank” call. A prank call implies something done in fun for fun. This has malicious deceit written all over it. It was a premeditated attempt to destroy the governor. Far from just a “prank”.
Typical for liberals, but still disgusting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.