I don’t have to see it to detest the idea of it.
You have to be pretty freaking mathematically challenged — arithmetically challenged, really — not to be able to foresee the huge damage such a lifestyle will do if it spreads to the wider society.
Even if you can’t do the math (1 + 1 = 2), just look at the muzzie societies, where the rich have 4 wives and the poor men are all practicing fags who publicly denounce fagness and many of whom become terrorists who willingly blow themselves up to get 72 virgins.
It’s a sick sick lifestyle and one of the main reasons I’m against “gay marriage”, because I want to preserve Western Civilization which depends on, among other things, the preservation of the sanctity of marriage and family.
Call me, oh, I don’t know, a conservative. But that’s just the way I think.
You’re against gay “marriage” because you want to preserve Western Civilization.
Which states a Great Truth (in the converse).
Those promoting homo “marriage” seek the destruction of Western Civilization.
Actually, you have described it perfectly: the defenders of polygamy don’t want to understand that what we have here is A MATH PROBLEM. One they seek to codify and normalize into our culture.
Any lifestyle that produces an excess of single, unattached males will need to wage war to cull the herd. Period. Yet, any lifestyle that resticts males (by the artificial means of kicking them out of the family by making them homeless) will, by simple math, need to continue to lower the age of eligible females. Right up through, and including: incest, child brides, etc.
Oh, and I won’t call you a “conservative”,
I’ll be more accurate and descriptive -
you’re an “Americanist”.
We already have an unofficial polygamous culture in America, in case you didn’t know. It’s called welfare communities.
Even if you can’t do the math (1 + 1 = 2), just look at the muzzie societies, where the rich have 4 wives and the poor men are all practicing fags who publicly denounce fagness and many of whom become terrorists who willingly blow themselves up to get 72 virgins.
The surplus male problem is also a serious exaggeration. You left out the option of both men and women having affairs. It does happen. In addition, there is also serial divorce and remarriage. There are plenty of unofficial polygamists in the United States, only unofficial because they don’t have a legal marriage license, these would include your typical Hollywood Superstar (serial marriage, promiscuity, affairs, multiple families being supported, etc.) I would actually be surprised with all of this non-monogamous behavior, that the U.S. doesn’t have a serious surplus of men already. The primary reasons I have found for a male surplus have been more related to abortion than polygamy.
As for this situation, the worst crime these people commit, IMO, is cutting themselves off from the rest of society, and the fact that it isn’t a problem for so many people to tolerate someone living in our nation yet not taking part in the processes that affect the rest of us as well. Just about every other problem that they have comes from this.