Skip to comments.
150 days in jail for man who pointed finger gun at cops
The Herald-Argus ^
| February 19, 2011
| Stan Maddux
Posted on 02/21/2011 11:04:08 AM PST by jaydubya2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
BANG, BANG!
1
posted on
02/21/2011 11:04:12 AM PST
by
jaydubya2
To: jaydubya2
I would have taken my chances with a jury.
To: jaydubya2
3
posted on
02/21/2011 11:07:47 AM PST
by
Jonty30
To: jaydubya2
“Stand back! I have a finger and I’m not afraid to use it!”
4
posted on
02/21/2011 11:10:39 AM PST
by
Guyin4Os
(A messianic ger-tsedek)
To: jaydubya2
Oy. Just freaking Oy. It’s so much easier to run roughshod over harmless stooges than it is over real menaces to society.
To: jaydubya2
The union cops should have shot the wife (since a dog was not around) and then cut off the guys hand.
The citizens cannot and must not intimidate the union cops in ANY way or manner.
To: Jonty30
Maybe it was loaded.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Well more than likely it had a nail in it.
He could have said “Pull my finger” but that may have had bad results with a bunch of cops threatening to arrest you.
7
posted on
02/21/2011 11:14:07 AM PST
by
xrmusn
((6/98) "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits")
To: jaydubya2
Good thing he didn’t have a dog.
8
posted on
02/21/2011 11:14:30 AM PST
by
ReverendJames
(Only A Painter Or A Liberal Can Change Black To White.)
To: jaydubya2
57 years old and not any smarter than a 10 year old.
they shoot dumb asses like this in PDX.
2 domestic calls in one day, usual ‘not taking me alive’ crap, shoots his mouth off at the cops, resists.
lucky old fool.
9
posted on
02/21/2011 11:15:09 AM PST
by
enraged
To: the invisib1e hand
Oy. Just freaking Oy. Its so much easier to run roughshod over harmless stooges than it is over real menaces to society. Harmless? The officers were TWICE called to his house. Why were they called and who called? What was he doing and Who was he doing it to?
10
posted on
02/21/2011 11:16:08 AM PST
by
SeeSac
To: jaydubya2
A La Porte man will go to jail for pretending with his finger to shoot at police. He pleaded guilty to Class D felony intimidation.
I'm concerned for the citizens of La Porte if their policemen get intimidated by just a finger. What would happen if they faced a real weapon..............run and hide in Rockford, IL???
11
posted on
02/21/2011 11:18:11 AM PST
by
varon
(Allegiance to the Constitution, always. Allegiance to a party, never!)
To: proxy_user
I would have taken my chances with a jury. Two domestic violence calls in less than an hour, physically resisting arrest .... Why would you go to a jury?
12
posted on
02/21/2011 11:18:35 AM PST
by
SeeSac
To: varon
policemen get intimidated by just a finger After repeat calls to the same address for violence by the same man, I would take it as a threat for future actions.
13
posted on
02/21/2011 11:22:10 AM PST
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
To: jaydubya2
In my opinion, the whole reason we have the First Amendment is so that you can go out in public and say, "I oppose King George III! I demand revolution! I say we hang all the SOBs in parliament!"
The Constitution should allow us to express our politics like that. But pointing a finger at a cop? Into the re-education camp for you!
To: jaydubya2
If that is a crime I will grantee you about 69% of the cops should be in jail for the same thing.
To: jaydubya2
If that is a crime I will grantee you about 69% of the cops should be in jail for the same thing.
To: SeeSac
He was apparently sentenced for the finger trick, not for the other complaints. Question is-were the officers in any real danger from the ‘loaded’ finger? After all they are really armed and the finger dude, well, just had a finger and maybe some ‘lethal’ flying shoes. ‘Scared’ law enforcement officers are dangerous officers.
17
posted on
02/21/2011 11:32:08 AM PST
by
yadent
To: yadent
He was apparently sentenced for the finger trick, not for the other complaints.Before the 'finger trick' he proclaimed that they would never arrest him. He plead guilty to intimidation of the officers. It was more than just a 'finger trick'. They were called to his house twice for domestic disputes.
18
posted on
02/21/2011 11:36:40 AM PST
by
SeeSac
To: ClearCase_guy
In my opinion, the whole reason we have the First Amendment is so that you can go out in public and say, The problem with your statement is that the cops were called to his house TWICE in one day for domestic disputes. And obviously there was something else going on as he proclaimed they would not be able to arrest him BEFORE he gave them the finger and shouted 'bang bang'.
19
posted on
02/21/2011 11:38:58 AM PST
by
SeeSac
To: Guyin4Os
In WW1 a soldier ran out of ammo and his leader told him to just point his finger
and say pow. Well it worked until there was one man walking over a hill towards him.
The soldier complained his finger stopped working and as the enemy drew closer
he was finally heard to be saying Tankity-Tank Tankity-Tsnk.
20
posted on
02/21/2011 11:45:05 AM PST
by
MaxMax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson