Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Isn't Trying to 'Weaken America' (RINO op-ed)
Wall St Journal ^ | 02/14/11 | MICHAEL MEDVED

Posted on 02/14/2011 8:32:31 AM PST by nhwingut

Some conservative commentators may feel inclined to spend Presidents Day ruminating over Barack Obama's evil intentions, or denouncing the chief executive as an alien interloper and ideologue perversely determined to damage the republic. Instead, they should consider the history of John Adams's White House prayer and develop a more effective focus for their criticism.

On Nov. 2, 1800, a day after he became the first president to occupy the newly constructed executive mansion, Adams wrote to his wife Abigail: "I pray Heaven to bestow the best of blessings on this house and all that shall hereafter inhabit it. May none but honest and wise men ever rule under this roof."

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: americanstrength; impeachment; medved; michaelmedved; obama; removal; traitor; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 02/14/2011 8:32:36 AM PST by nhwingut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Michael Medved..a long time liberal apologist. ‘Nuf said.


2 posted on 02/14/2011 8:34:38 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

No, of course not.

He is trying to destroy it. To wit, note the use of Egypt as a proxy to obliterate Israel. To wit, collapsing the dollar with QE. To wit, proceeding unconstitutionally with health care and oil drilling.


3 posted on 02/14/2011 8:35:55 AM PST by C210N (0bama, Making the US safe for Global Marxism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

“Trying”?


4 posted on 02/14/2011 8:36:35 AM PST by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

In a rare moment of truth, obama told us that he was going to fundamentally change this country.
Fundamentally means to redo the whole order of things.
And his media cheers.


5 posted on 02/14/2011 8:36:38 AM PST by Texas resident (Hunkered Down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Medved is an anti birther like O Reilly, Beck, Ingraham, Boortz, Coulter, Hewitt and a few other fake conservatives who like that Prince Al Waleed Saudi cash.


6 posted on 02/14/2011 8:37:01 AM PST by Frantzie (HD TV - Total Brain-washing now in High Def. 3-D Coming soon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

That’s a shame. He is so incompetent I wouldn’t be half as worried if the destruction of the US was what he was trying to do.


7 posted on 02/14/2011 8:37:39 AM PST by magslinger (Samuel Colt, feminist. Making women equal to men for over 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Why don’t you, Michael, consider HIS history of Bill Ayers, Racist Wright, Franklin Davis and the people he has surrounded himself with: Van Jones, Jarrett, The Wise Latina, Rahmie, Kagan et al, their views towards the USA?


8 posted on 02/14/2011 8:38:02 AM PST by A_Former_Democrat (The Rodney King Riots: Courtesy of ABC, CBS, NBC & CNN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident

“And his media cheers.” Hopefully the public will wake up and yank the plug on Obama TV. Prince Al Waleed’s Fox is no better.


9 posted on 02/14/2011 8:38:26 AM PST by Frantzie (HD TV - Total Brain-washing now in High Def. 3-D Coming soon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: C210N

Don’t forget a $3.7 TRILLION budget where nearly half the money will come from the printing press.


10 posted on 02/14/2011 8:38:47 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Medved basically trashes the entire conservative movement.


11 posted on 02/14/2011 8:38:56 AM PST by nhwingut (Palin '12... Accept No Other)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

It was an odd opinion piece to be quite honest.

It didn’t actually make any arguments that the big O isn’t trying to weaken the U.S., but rather spent a lot of time on how even bad presidents in the past didn’t have bad intentions. Then it pointed out that the allegations that the O is trying to harm the nation makes the accuser look bad.

Both of those are somewhat reasonable. However they don’t actually address his stated thesis.

I will admit that it isn’t a good position to take in the wider media that the O is trying to hurt America (even if he likely is, and trust me, it wouldn’t shock me since this much concentrated incompetence can’t just be a coincidence) because you can come out looking like a wingnut. However Don’t make that your central thesis the fact that the harm is unintentional when that really is debatable.


12 posted on 02/14/2011 8:39:51 AM PST by drbuzzard (different league)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

A conservative poseur. ‘Nuff said...


13 posted on 02/14/2011 8:40:06 AM PST by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Mike’s relatives thought communism would strengthen America back in the day. IMO they were wrong and Mike still suffers from, “but they were good people” mentality.


14 posted on 02/14/2011 8:40:18 AM PST by junta (S.C.U.M. = State Controlled Unreliable Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
In short, the White House record of more than 200 years shows plenty of bad decisions but no bad men. For all their foibles, every president attempted to rise to the challenges of leadership and never displayed disloyal or treasonous intent.

No president ever sat in a church like Rev Wright's either. No president ever befriended a domestic terrorist either.
15 posted on 02/14/2011 8:41:52 AM PST by nhwingut (Palin '12... Accept No Other)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
Micheal Medved? Since when does anyone want to hear what this old buddy of Hillary Clinton has to say? Why doesn't he write about something he knows, what movie I should go see.


16 posted on 02/14/2011 8:42:39 AM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
None of the attacks on Mr. Obama's intentions offers an even vaguely plausible explanation of how the evil genius, once he has ruined our "strength, influence and standard of living," hopes to get himself re-elected.

Mr. Medved. This is the point is it not? It is obvious that he has vigorously pursued things that are demonstrably unpopular. So to what do you attribute this Mr. Medved? Burden of proof switch please.

Somehow your article fails to address the point.

17 posted on 02/14/2011 8:43:19 AM PST by Rippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut
OK. Mike.. name ONE good appointee Obama has made?..
Obama has surrounded himself with incompetents and in your face socialists(or WORSE)..

Mike have you ever heard of Cloward-Piven?...

**NOTE: Mike is either willfully stupid OR complicit with it.. I've just upgraded Medved to Useful Idiot..

18 posted on 02/14/2011 8:43:32 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Whether he’s trying or not, and that’s debatable, even his would-be defenders implicitly report that’s what he is in fact doing. Since he is, what are we to do about it? Sorry, Oprah, but this job isn’t a giveaway so that he and you can feel better about your race as he learns on the job - and he’s not even descended from the enslaved Africans; he’s descended from the Africans who enslaved other Africans.


19 posted on 02/14/2011 8:44:40 AM PST by OldNewYork (social justice isn't justice; it's just socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat
Michael Medved is too concerned with staking out middle ground as one of the 'reasonable elite' to allow actual evidence to inform his opinion.

He calls himself 'conservative' for ratings but appears to most fear being associated with the 'right wing'.

His opinion should carry about as much weight as Bill ORielly's.

20 posted on 02/14/2011 8:44:58 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson