[AnalogReigns]

I don’t know what NoLibZone’s reasoning may be, but “gay rights” is a direct assault on religious liberty.

When I am forced to hire, promote, or provide shelter for people I regard as morally perverse (and a perverting, corrupting influence) against my solidly, deeply, based religious principles, then, there is no religious freedom in America anymore.

Why someone as sharp as Anne can’t realize that, I don’t know except that:

A) She’s a lawyer
B) She’s from NYC.

[Mariner]

"but “gay rights” is a direct assault on religious liberty."

I absolutely agree the "gay rights" agenda is both anti-religious and anti-liberty.

[B Knotts]

Exactly right. This is what the entire issue is really about: religious freedom.