Posted on 02/06/2011 1:12:17 AM PST by speciallybland
Hawaii's newly elected "DSA-er Democrat" Governor Neil "I am not a socialist" Abercrombie is the birthers' best friend -- and many commentators in Hawaii and across the nation are becoming increasingly annoyed by his antics.
In two recent interviews, with just a few anti-birthy words in December 24 and January 18 interviews magnified and distorted by the national and international media, Abercrombie has succeeded in raising birtherism from the dead. And both he and President Barack Obama are very pleased with the opportunity to shift political discussion away from the thumping Obama took in the November midterms.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
AberCommie has shut his flapping pie hole. He can't do much "distracting" when his gums have gone silent. He should distract some more. Yeah, there was sooooo much distracting going on in the last 2 years that the Republicans had a 63 seat landslide loss in Congress, and they lost over 700 state legislator seats across the nation.
Nope
BamBam the so called 'leader' has the proof. ALL he needs to do is open the books. Or maybe just maybe he is NOT qualified to do so.
Duh. We all have access to our OWN documents. He's eminently qualified to get a copy of his own BC. I've done so with my own because I needed a new copy of my SS card, and it don't cost $2 million dollars to do it.
The Democrats losses in the Congress had nothing to do with Obama’s BC. LOL
McStain was an open target for question, in that he was born in Panama, and maybe not really in the Canal Zone.
I do not know when the Obambie birth issue came up.
I do not think it was even on the radar screen at first.
Keep in mind, I have not been in the USA since Jan. 2005
and had no idea who Obama was. I had never heard of him.
I think someone, far too late, saw flaws in the bogus certification, pointing out that anyone could walk in off the street and get one.
That is when people started taking names and asking questions.
Everything about Obambie is questionable.
If he were a Republican he would be in jail by now.
Taitz must have been veeerrrry tricky indeed if she could still be an official Dem and still run as a Republican in her bid in 2010 primary election for the GOP nominee as the California secretary of state.
Not so tricky, they’re called RINO’s.
Lord McCain ran for president in 2000 and nary a question arose over his eligibility. But out of the wild blue yonder in 2008 arises a question in the Senate of all place to resolve they deem him qualified... Manipulation is correct alright and it is still being spewed all over US.
Let the first state in this nation require any who runs for the office of president to provide their eligibility paper and watch these manipulators scream like stuck pigs.
According to the clowns, AberCrombie, OBots, assorted concerned trolls, and other dregs of society, the faux Obama birth certificate story and his lack of eligibility was a big winning issue for the Democrats. So what happened Sherlock? Oh, that's right, the "big distraction" ended in epic failure. No pie for the Dems.
Hey trumandogz — try applying for a passport without a long form... Answer that....
“Lord McCain ran for president in 2000 and nary a question arose over his eligibility”
Look, I understand your dislike for McStain, but it is totally irrelevant now.
Concentrate your efforts on the illegal Marxist that is now in office.
My disdain for lord McCain is not the object or topic of this discussion. There was NO question regarding lord McCain's eligibility to be president in 2000. But for whatever reason 'his' eligibility was brought up and resolved by the Senate as being eligible to be president in 2008.
I view this resolution to be part of the 'manipulation' by the Senate who had to have some awareness of BamBam's edibility standing. Yet that resolve NEVER came forth. I contend that the mover and shakers of the Senate like that old now dead lion of the Senate, that came forth and anointed BamBam as coming in the spirit of JFK would NOT allow such question to be asked.
And as such the now dead old lion of the Senate made it his life's work to destroy as much of the Constitution as he could possibly do so, would have likewise done his part to keep hidden the historical record of BamBam's origins.
I do not have a “long form birth certificate” but do have an FS-240 which expedited my passport application process.
My US passport was ready within an hour but my siblings who were born in the states had to wait a couple weeks.
“Why would someone keep a passport that has been expired for 20 years?”
I just now came across your post...
Well, I can not imagine ANYONE destroying their old passports.
They are a perfect record of where and when you have been in the world.
My original passport is a rich treasure of the many countries that I have visited, and was once so full that I had to have
pages A-X added. I have since started a new passport, but I frequently look up data in my previous passport.
Why on earth would you shred it, unless you are a criminal?
And please ping me once the State Department gets back with you on the details of Obama’s “civilian” passport.
The only details they are going to tell you about his “Civilian” passport is that it is blue and has an image of the Great Seal of the United States on the front.
My old passports are of no use to me and I can pretty much remember most of the countries that I have been to.
And no, your passport does not provide a perfect record of where you have been in the world since not all countries have a process by which to check your passport when you enter their country and in some cases it is a good idea if your passport is not stamped by a country that you visit.
“and in some cases it is a good idea if your passport is not stamped by a country that you visit.”
Well, I have never been in a country that did not stamp my passport. The exception being in the EU, where there are no
longer immigration checks.
Abercombie did not help Obama.
He actually brought to light how unprofessional Obama and his cronies are. Plus helped prompt many states to start drafting legislation to make sure this does not happen again.
Even before the establishment of the EU one could travel between some of the N. European countries without an immigration check.
The problem with having your passport stamped is that while it may not be a problem for you to visit country B when you later must go to country C it could cause a problem to have a B stamp is your passport.
For example, my wife is of a certain religion and travels to a certain country every year or so.
For the purposes of my work, I have traveled to a certain kingdom that is located in the same general region of that country my wife like to visit.
The word is that if the wrong people in that kingdom were to see that I visited that other country, I could have some issues ranging from being kicked out of the kingdom to having a certain body part that is located in the same general region of my neck chopped off.
keep up the good work
tammy wynnette would be proud
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.