This is the same ignorant horsecrap you could hear on any one of a thousand small-town community collage campuses across the nation.
The woman is a moron.
Here is the solution... it could be done if the right case is built... and there are 20 million pages of evidence against this lesbian communist:
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Can_a_US_Supreme_Court_justice_be_impeached_and_removed_from_office
Under normal circumstances, a Supreme Court justice is awarded a lifetime commission.
A Supreme Court Justice may be impeached by the House of Representatives and removed from office if convicted in a Senate trial, but only for the same types of offenses that would trigger impeachment proceedings for any other government official under Articles I and II of the Constitution.
Only one Supreme Court Justice, Samuel Chase (one of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence), has ever been impeached. The House of Representatives accused Chase of letting his Federalist political leanings affect his rulings, and served him with eight articles of impeachment in late 1804. The Senate acquitted him of all charges in 1805, establishing the right of the judiciary to independent opinion. Chase continued on the Court until his death in June 1811.
LLS
Why is anyone surprised by this. It was well known long before the wise Latina’s confirmation hearing that she is in fact a person who judges people by the color of their skin or their ethnicity as opposed to the content of their character.
Rat icon and superhero FDR. Not much has changed with progressive Rats.
No. We have views and expectations of you because of what you've said and done, like the ‘wise Latina’ comment and this incredibly self-serving comment about different kinds of colorblindness. Actually, anyone who uses the term ‘people of color’ has pretty much self-identified as a racist.
A real team player, eh?
WAY too complex a thought!
Supposed conservative justices turn liberal on the bench. I pray that a liberal will see the light on the bench. This one has a ways to go.
As a woman and as a “Latina,” she makes me want to throw up. She is an embarrassment to both categories.
When you appoint a racist, Marxist bigot to the Supreme Court, you get a racist Marxist.
But then look at her racist Marxist patron.
I wonder if Obummer was ever a member of the Nation of Islam.
Obama chastised the Supremes to their face in front of the world.
Supremes are now coming out against each other (liberal ones attacking others)
Sen Schumer says the Supreme court isn’t part of our government...Only the President, the House of Rep. and the Senate...
Obama administration not adhering to federal judges’ rulings.
See a pattern working here?
Obama and congress working together and no Supreme court or Federal judges, to hold them accountable with our Constitutional restraints on government. Isn’t that a dictatorship?
Sotomayer’s who being is tied into her racial identity. She is NOT a full person. This society will not survive such touchy-feely thought. A system of law can not just be “whatever feels right today”.
Idiot woman.
If I could I would ask her which doctor she wants performing brain surgery on her, the qualified one or the PC one.
Weak, foolish republicans put her in the Supreme Court.
We will live to regret their weakness.
Justice Sotomayor also talked about being the first Hispanic woman on the Supreme Court.......
....The justice said that she doesn’t let her racial identity affect her judgment in cases but is convinced that others pre-judge her
________________________________________________
AH maybe because you make an issue of the fact that you are “Hispanic” etc
and when has Hispanic been equated to “color”
Maybe you can get away with “minority” but the first “Hispanics” in the New World were considered white men and they were from Europe...
If your ancestors were from Spain then they were considered white...
If your ancestors were Central or South American Indians and “people of color” then they were not Hispanic at all...
Wasn’t she Barry’s personal eligibility lawyer?
And this is a surprise? Too many whites are either naive, sheltered or plain stupid.
So it in not because of what she has achieved, it if because of what she is.
This is supposed to be about equality of opportunity. Not legislated outcomes.