Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Any sentient being (but not every Republican senator) knew these were her views before she was confirmed. Her comments prove that the "stereotypes" about her are TRUE.
1 posted on 02/05/2011 5:23:48 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: reaganaut1
""I don't borrow Chief Justice Roberts's description of what colorblindness is," she said. "Our society is too complex to use that kind of analysis.""

This is the same ignorant horsecrap you could hear on any one of a thousand small-town community collage campuses across the nation.

The woman is a moron.

2 posted on 02/05/2011 5:28:30 AM PST by Psycho_Bunny (Hail To The Fail-In-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Here is the solution... it could be done if the right case is built... and there are 20 million pages of evidence against this lesbian communist:

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Can_a_US_Supreme_Court_justice_be_impeached_and_removed_from_office

Under normal circumstances, a Supreme Court justice is awarded a lifetime commission.

A Supreme Court Justice may be impeached by the House of Representatives and removed from office if convicted in a Senate trial, but only for the same types of offenses that would trigger impeachment proceedings for any other government official under Articles I and II of the Constitution.

Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Can_a_US_Supreme_Court_justice_be_impeached_and_removed_from_office#ixzz1D5fycsTC

Only one Supreme Court Justice, Samuel Chase (one of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence), has ever been impeached. The House of Representatives accused Chase of letting his Federalist political leanings affect his rulings, and served him with eight articles of impeachment in late 1804. The Senate acquitted him of all charges in 1805, establishing the right of the judiciary to independent opinion. Chase continued on the Court until his death in June 1811.

Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Can_a_US_Supreme_Court_justice_be_impeached_and_removed_from_office#ixzz1D5gGVU4K

LLS


3 posted on 02/05/2011 5:31:02 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Gee I wonder if she also celebrates infanticide...of course she does. What a tramp/slut she is
4 posted on 02/05/2011 5:31:17 AM PST by Friendofgeorge (Sarah Palin 2012 or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Why is anyone surprised by this. It was well known long before the wise Latina’s confirmation hearing that she is in fact a person who judges people by the color of their skin or their ethnicity as opposed to the content of their character.


5 posted on 02/05/2011 5:32:22 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
"When the Chief Justice read me the oath and came to the words ‘support the Constitution of the United States' I felt like saying: ‘Yes, but it's the Constitution as I understand it, flexible enough to meet any new problem of democracy -- not the kind of Constitution your Court has raised up as a barrier to progress and democracy.'"

Rat icon and superhero FDR. Not much has changed with progressive Rats.

6 posted on 02/05/2011 5:35:30 AM PST by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic is now on Kindle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
“People have views of me and expectations of me that are based on stereotypes,” she said.”

No. We have views and expectations of you because of what you've said and done, like the ‘wise Latina’ comment and this incredibly self-serving comment about different kinds of colorblindness. Actually, anyone who uses the term ‘people of color’ has pretty much self-identified as a racist.

11 posted on 02/05/2011 5:39:22 AM PST by pieceofthepuzzle (Left vs. Right = Pseudo-intellectuals vs. Grown-ups)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

A real team player, eh?


14 posted on 02/05/2011 5:41:45 AM PST by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1; verga
"the way to stop discriminating on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race."

WAY too complex a thought!

Supposed conservative justices turn liberal on the bench. I pray that a liberal will see the light on the bench. This one has a ways to go.

15 posted on 02/05/2011 5:42:02 AM PST by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

As a woman and as a “Latina,” she makes me want to throw up. She is an embarrassment to both categories.


16 posted on 02/05/2011 5:45:44 AM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

When you appoint a racist, Marxist bigot to the Supreme Court, you get a racist Marxist.

But then look at her racist Marxist patron.

I wonder if Obummer was ever a member of the Nation of Islam.


17 posted on 02/05/2011 5:46:51 AM PST by ZULU (No nation which ever attempted to tolerate Islam, escaped total Islamization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Obama chastised the Supremes to their face in front of the world.

Supremes are now coming out against each other (liberal ones attacking others)

Sen Schumer says the Supreme court isn’t part of our government...Only the President, the House of Rep. and the Senate...

Obama administration not adhering to federal judges’ rulings.

See a pattern working here?

Obama and congress working together and no Supreme court or Federal judges, to hold them accountable with our Constitutional restraints on government. Isn’t that a dictatorship?


19 posted on 02/05/2011 5:51:38 AM PST by Freddd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Sotomayer’s who being is tied into her racial identity. She is NOT a full person. This society will not survive such touchy-feely thought. A system of law can not just be “whatever feels right today”.


21 posted on 02/05/2011 5:56:45 AM PST by Clock King (Ellisworth Toohey was right: My head's gonna explode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Idiot woman.


23 posted on 02/05/2011 6:10:47 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion is the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

If I could I would ask her which doctor she wants performing brain surgery on her, the qualified one or the PC one.


25 posted on 02/05/2011 6:19:35 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Weak, foolish republicans put her in the Supreme Court.

We will live to regret their weakness.


26 posted on 02/05/2011 6:26:40 AM PST by Iron Munro ("Our country's founders cherished liberty, not democracy." -- Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Justice Sotomayor also talked about being the first Hispanic woman on the Supreme Court.......

....The justice said that she doesn’t let her racial identity affect her judgment in cases but is convinced that others pre-judge her
________________________________________________

AH maybe because you make an issue of the fact that you are “Hispanic” etc

and when has Hispanic been equated to “color”

Maybe you can get away with “minority” but the first “Hispanics” in the New World were considered white men and they were from Europe...

If your ancestors were from Spain then they were considered white...

If your ancestors were Central or South American Indians and “people of color” then they were not Hispanic at all...


27 posted on 02/05/2011 6:29:12 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Wasn’t she Barry’s personal eligibility lawyer?


28 posted on 02/05/2011 6:40:57 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
do I really have to say it???

29 posted on 02/05/2011 7:33:27 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Sotomayor, Unplugged (supports racial preferences)

And this is a surprise? Too many whites are either naive, sheltered or plain stupid.

34 posted on 02/05/2011 8:39:56 AM PST by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
"To the extent my presence has given people of color a sense of belonging with the court, then I have made a difference," she said.

So it in not because of what she has achieved, it if because of what she is.

This is supposed to be about equality of opportunity. Not legislated outcomes.

39 posted on 02/05/2011 9:31:02 AM PST by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson