Skip to comments.
White House Wants (unconstitutional) Obamacare on Slow Legal Track
2/04/11
Posted on 02/04/2011 12:39:08 PM PST by Libloather
Bloomberg News link only - White House Wants Obamacare on Slow Legal Track
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: commiecare; judgevinson; legal; obamacare; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: BubbaJunebug
Here is how the deck will be stacked...everyones favorite wussy senator is about to f... up the FLA judges ruling
Barrasso, Graham Introduce Legislation Allowing States to Opt-Out of Obamacare
WASHINGTON U.S. Senators Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and John Barrasso (R-Wyoming) today introduced S.244, The State Health Care Choice Act, to repeal and replace Obamacare by allowing states to Opt-Out of its major provisions. Under the legislation, states could choose to Opt-Out of:
Then the opt out states are now experiencing taxation without benefitation. So most of the red states opt out, and pay the blue states health care.
Please just kill this monster.
To: Beagle8U
With all of the Righthaven crap it’s really best to just link and excerpt. They are going after individual posters now not just the websites.
22
posted on
02/04/2011 1:13:05 PM PST
by
CajunConservative
(0, we'll stop treating you like a dog, when you stop treating us like a hydrant.)
To: Libloather
if the courts don’t find the brown Clown in contempt we ought to pull an Egypt on HIM.Love to see his a$$ physically hauled out of the People’s House.
23
posted on
02/04/2011 1:15:50 PM PST
by
Renegade
To: Springfield Reformer
I have an email in to Mark asking how to pursue this, but Im not really expecting a reply.If you do get an answer, please do post it here. That could be very cool.
24
posted on
02/04/2011 1:21:40 PM PST
by
ProfoundMan
(Time to finish the Reagan Revolution! - RightyPics.com)
To: Libloather
White House Wants (unconstitutional) Obamacare on Slow Legal Track
Hey, Barry! After the judge's decision in Florida, it's not okay for you to continue implementing this until it reaches the Supreme Court. You're supposed to cease implementation until such time as the Supreme Court tells you to resume or until the Republican House funds your efforts. The House needs immediate hearings about 1. Barry's defiance of this judge's ruling, 2. Barry's defiance of the ruling against the drilling moratorium, and a bunch of other things.
25
posted on
02/04/2011 1:21:53 PM PST
by
aruanan
To: Renegade
26
posted on
02/04/2011 1:23:56 PM PST
by
Guenevere
(....)
To: Libloather
that tells me the Supremes just might take the case on an expedited basis, if only to get even with Barry for his dressing-down at last year’s SOTU.
To: MrEdd
Obongwater doesnt get to decide. Especially since he dissed the SCOTUS justices so publicly at last year's SOTU speech.
28
posted on
02/04/2011 1:25:38 PM PST
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Tyrants flourish only when they achieve a standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace.)
To: ProfoundMan
To: Renegade
We’ve learned from Barky that a few 10’s of thousands of people demanding a new government need to be “listened to” and that the government must change NOW.
So, what of the 9/12 rally, Barky?
What if they had stuck around a while, demanding your ouster?
30
posted on
02/04/2011 1:53:04 PM PST
by
MrB
(Tagline suspended for important announcement on my about page. Click my handle.)
To: Springfield Reformer; Liz; AT7Saluki; writer33
...according to him, makes it a felony for state bureaucrats to tap ObamaCare funds for a law that has been voidedI like it. Flee Levin is on my listening docket tonight. Replay of Laura Ingraham is on right now. (My fav - soundbite of the week segment.)
31
posted on
02/04/2011 2:04:51 PM PST
by
Libloather
(The epitome of civility.)
To: SuzyQue; Stillwaters
Of course they do. They longer it takes, the more chance they have to stack the deck. Who knows - one of the constitutionalists on the Supreme Court could resign or otherwise vacate their spot, giving barama a chance to appoint to fill their seat. One more SCJ would be all it would take. Absolutely, that's what they're hoping for. It's a scary thing knowing that our fate can be held in the hand of one man/woman this way. It's the ultimate example of elections having consequences.
32
posted on
02/04/2011 2:18:26 PM PST
by
lonevoice
(Where the Welfare State is on the march, the Police State is not far behind)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
If the Administration actually believed that Obamacare was constitutional, they would want it ruled as such by the SCOTUS as soon as possible. In particular, before the 2012 election.
Then Jarrett, as has been somewhat loosely reported elsewhere, wouldn’t be holding meetings on how to keep Obamacare from being a “liability” in 2012.
33
posted on
02/04/2011 2:46:24 PM PST
by
fightinJAG
(Americans: the only people in the world protesting AGAINST government "benefits.")
To: aruanan
Hey, Barry! After the judge’s decision in Florida, it’s not okay for you to continue implementing this until it reaches the Supreme Court.
***************************************************
Unfortunately the likelihood that the Vinson ruling will be appealed by the Government is 100%. If the 11th Circuit Court stays the ruling while the case is being reviewed then Obamacare will be back as The Law of the Land. This is the most likely state of affairs for at least the next 12 months and maybe longer. And it could happen within the next 10 days. Stay tuned and pray that the 11th will do the right thing and deny the motion to stay the Vinson ruling. In that case Obamacare is once again DOA.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson