Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Wants (unconstitutional) Obamacare on Slow Legal Track
2/04/11

Posted on 02/04/2011 12:39:08 PM PST by Libloather

Bloomberg News link only - White House Wants Obamacare on Slow Legal Track


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: commiecare; judgevinson; legal; obamacare; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Friday afternoon news dump? I don't think so. The rookie Hussein is up to his elbows in trouble right now.

BTW, leftists HATE the term 'Obamacare.' Please feel free to use it as much as possible.

1 posted on 02/04/2011 12:39:12 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Too bad, so sad.

We want it there yesterday.

2 posted on 02/04/2011 12:40:41 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Too damned bad. The judiciary is a separate branch of government from the executive branch.

Obongwater doesn’t get to decide.


3 posted on 02/04/2011 12:42:31 PM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

This White House wants to do as much damage to the U.S.A. as possible. Slowing the inevitable SCOTUS confrontation will help them achieve that goal.

Businesses are basically catatonic, unable to make important decisions concerning their employees.


4 posted on 02/04/2011 12:43:16 PM PST by SatinDoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Of course they do. They longer it takes, the more chance they have to stack the deck. Who knows - one of the constitutionalists on the Supreme Court could resign or otherwise vacate their spot, giving barama a chance to appoint to fill their seat. One more SCJ would be all it would take.


5 posted on 02/04/2011 12:43:29 PM PST by SuzyQue (Remember to think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

I would love to hear a report the SC is taking the case on the fast track and I hope it is Roberts who states it.

Bring it on.


6 posted on 02/04/2011 12:49:33 PM PST by Mouton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

No... what these scumbags want to do is implement as much as possible as quick as possible and then scream about how many gov’t jobs are lost and all the money spent on infrstructure, the best method is still just to defund the entire boondogle.


7 posted on 02/04/2011 12:49:52 PM PST by mapmaker77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Newsmax is Bloomberg ?

That link is to Newsmax.


8 posted on 02/04/2011 12:50:21 PM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue
Who knows - one of the constitutionalists on the Supreme Court could resign or otherwise vacate their spot, giving barama a chance to appoint to fill their seat. One more SCJ would be all it would take.

Don't ever believe one might not leave the court via the "Chicago Way"!

9 posted on 02/04/2011 12:51:30 PM PST by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Party affiliation has made the difference so far with health care. The two trial judges who declared the law unconstitutional -- Hudson and Florida’s Roger Vinson -- are both Republican appointees. The judges who upheld the law -- Norman Moon of Virginia and George Caram Steeh of Michigan -- were appointed by Democratic presidents.

Now we understand what Chukie Schumer meant when he identified the three branches of Government as the Executive, the Senate and the House. The Justice Department is now just a sub-branch of the Senate. Smart guy that Schumer.

10 posted on 02/04/2011 12:52:04 PM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

If you bother to read the entire article there is a copyright to Bloomberg at the bottom.


11 posted on 02/04/2011 12:52:57 PM PST by CajunConservative (0, we'll stop treating you like a dog, when you stop treating us like a hydrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Well, if angering leftists is what you’re after,
what about changing the name of the conservative ideology to

“Americanism”


12 posted on 02/04/2011 12:53:36 PM PST by MrB (Tagline suspended for important announcement on my about page. Click my handle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Ideally it needs to hit in mid September of 2012, during the final run into the Congressional elections.


13 posted on 02/04/2011 12:54:28 PM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Oops. Make that the Judicial Branch.


14 posted on 02/04/2011 12:54:33 PM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

It is up to the House to not fund one penny of it. Maybe defund HHS. They have the cards. We dealt em the cards. If they don’t Play em I won’t go through this again. It will be time for a real party.


15 posted on 02/04/2011 12:56:08 PM PST by screaminsunshine (Surfers Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CajunConservative
I read the article, but I guess I didn't pay attention to the bloomberg notation.
16 posted on 02/04/2011 12:57:32 PM PST by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; All
"White House Wants (unconstitutional) Obamacare on Slow Legal Track"


17 posted on 02/04/2011 1:01:37 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

Here is how the deck will be stacked...everyones favorite wussy senator is about to f... up the FLA judges ruling

Barrasso, Graham Introduce Legislation Allowing States to ‘Opt-Out’ of Obamacare

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and John Barrasso (R-Wyoming) today introduced S.244, The State Health Care Choice Act, to repeal and replace Obamacare by allowing states to ‘Opt-Out’ of its major provisions. Under the legislation, states could choose to ‘Opt-Out’ of:


18 posted on 02/04/2011 1:03:01 PM PST by BubbaJunebug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
I read the article, but I guess I didn't pay attention to the Bloomberg notation.

© Copyright 2010 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.

I'm trying to stay out of FReeper prison as much as possible.

19 posted on 02/04/2011 1:03:50 PM PST by Libloather (The epitome of civility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

What about Levin’s “641 strategy?” 18 USC 641, according to him, makes it a felony for state bureaucrats to tap ObamaCare funds for a law that has been voided, assuming the usual operation of Judicial Review as modernly practiced. So either judicial review is null and void, or ObamaCare is null and void. In light of this dilemma, surely state AGs owe it to their bureaucratic constituencies to warn them to stop implementing Obamacare now or risk prosecution for felony. I’m still thinking about how to do this here is Illinois. Our implementing agency is the Department of Insurance (DOI). I have an email in to Mark asking how to pursue this, but I’m not really expecting a reply. All (reasonable) suggestions are welcome.


20 posted on 02/04/2011 1:05:04 PM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson