Posted on 02/03/2011 10:16:23 PM PST by OldDeckHand
Judge Roger Vinson's ruling striking down the health-care law's individual mandate and, with it, the rest of the statute, may or may not stand up in higher courts. But it's more convincing than some arguments I've read on the other side.
My colleague Ezra Klein, for example, argues that "whatever the legal argument about the individual mandate is about, it's not, as some of its detractors would have it, a question of liberty." The individual mandate involves less intrusion in private markets and more personal choice than alternatives such as a single-payer system, Ezra notes -- borrowing the point from no less a conservative eminence than Charles Fried of Harvard Law School. Indeed, quite a few liberty-loving Republicans have supported various individual mandates in the past. This proves, according to Ezra, that conservative and Republican opposition to the current iteration of the individual mandate is just legal pettifoggery and political opportunism.
Uh, no.
(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...
The individual mandate involves less intrusion in private markets and more personal choice -——
What a load of BS.
The individual mandate is a mandate that you must buy Insurance...that’s pretty damn intrusive not much choice there...
Doesn’t matter it’s VOID it’s not even law now.
Its about freedom.
I’d rather go to jail then pay their fine. The government is NOT the owner of my body!
The fine will be collected with your taxes—you won't be able to separate them—you would go to jail for tax evasion...
Fascists think of everything.
I just picked up the rarely needed prescription today. New insurance that was “given” to me to replace my previous. (Private plan).
I told the gal behind the counter “Here’s my new card - it now covers prescriptions. I didn’t want it, but that’s what they made me get. My deductible went way up, my premiums went way up, and my copays are almost triple. But hey, I now get my annual dose of antibiotics for $55 instead of $80. What a deal!”
One of the most evil statements I have witnessed in American media.
Comparing something 65% - 75% of the American people DON'T WANT to statism? We don't want EITHER OF THESE, Ezra, you Communist homosexual! Don't you get that?
Here's something you can understand, Ezra, given your predilections: being penetrated with a horseshoe peg is "less instrusive" that being penetrated by a tent pole, but NEITHER IS DESIRABLE by normal people!
Yeah, less intrusion and more choice. That's just what I think of when I hear the word "mandate."
Your point is well taken. However, from what I've heard, I believe that 16,000 may be a more accurate IRS agent prediction.
The Leftists are wanting more and more power over the people these days.
And its the right that is standing up for Liberty and Limited government.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.