[Tribune7]

This isn't a matter of censorship like the David Horowitz/Ann Coulter issues.

I got to question the wisdom of paying Bristol Palin $20 G to talk about teen pregnancy.

What's she going to say? Don't have a baby out-of-wedlock as a teenager or you will have to take a $20 G an hour job telling college kids not to have babies out of wedlock as teenagers?

[dforest]

I was thinking the same thing. How do you promote abstinence when getting preggers has rewarded you with DWTS, a radio job and a house.

It would have been a plus had she asked for travel expenses only and went and talked.

They probably would have tossed pies at her anyway.

I guess I could handle few pies in the face for a nice paycheck like that though. LOL

[CMAC51]

I got to question the wisdom of paying Bristol Palin $20 G to talk about teen pregnancy. What's she going to say? Don't have a baby out-of-wedlock as a teenager or you will have to take a $20 G an hour job telling college kids not to have babies out of wedlock as teenagers?

Transcripts of her previous public appearances on the subject are available on the web. Try reading one, then make a knowledgable comment aobut what she says. Right now the truth is that you have no idea and are just mouthing off with meaningless drivel.

[Josh Painter]

They were not going to pay her $20K. $20K is the amount they had planned to spend for the entire panel discussion event. Bristol’s speaking fee was reportedly half that much.

- JP

[sickoflibs]

RE :”I got to question the wisdom of paying Bristol Palin $20 G to talk about teen pregnancy. What's she going to say? Don't have a baby out-of-wedlock as a teenager or you will have to take a $20 G an hour job telling college kids not to have babies out of wedlock as teenagers?”

I didn't understand this either. If I was counting on Palin being elected president or just trying to help her look good, I wouldn't be posting an article like this. Things just get crazier and crazier.