Posted on 01/26/2011 12:22:30 PM PST by SeekAndFind
According to the Daily Caller’s Chris Moody, California Democrat Loretta Sanchez proposed yanking fellow Rep. Gabrielle Giffords off of the House Armed Services Committee after being at least temporarily disabled by a gunshot wound to the head less than three weeks ago. Sanchez argued that Democrats needed every vote they have on the panel and that they could not leave the seat open indefinitely. The reaction from her colleagues was, not surprisingly, strongly negative:
Behind closed doors, California Democratic Rep. Loretta Sanchez has proposed removing Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords from the House Armed Services Committee (HASC) until she recovers from injuries sustained after being shot in the head on Jan. 8 in Tucson, The Daily Caller has learned.
The proposal sparked an outrage, according to those in the room — including from those in Sanchez’s own party.
“It’s not appropriate,” Texas Democratic Rep. Silvestre Reyes told The Daily Caller, adding that there was outrage among some members in the room when Sanchez made the suggestion. “It’s bad for morale during her recovery period.”
Republicans have an eight-vote advantage on the committee. It’s possible that there will be some close votes, but it’s more likely that a single Democratic absence on the panel won’t have any impact at all this year. The absence of Giffords might make a difference in some subcommittees, but that could be addressed by asking a few of the HASC Democrats to add another subcommittee assignment temporarily, rather than replacing Giffords on the main committee.
Sanchez defended her proposal afterward through her spokesperson:
“Gabby has always been one of the most active members on the Armed Services Committee, and Rep. Sanchez wants to make sure HASC Democrats preserve her voice until the congresswoman has returned,” Sanchez’s Press Secretary Caroline Hogan told TheDC. “Rep. Sanchez simply inquired whether a proxy could represent the Congresswoman on the Committee at Rep. Giffords’ request. That way, Gabby’s legislative priorities and seniority would be preserved until her return. Any other interpretation of her question is ludicrous.”
Er, suuuure. The remaining Democrats on the panel could just as easily “preserve” Giffords’ legislative priorities by, well, doing it themselves, including Sanchez. There are 26 other Democrats on the committee; is Sanchez really arguing that among them, they couldn’t carry Giffords’ water for at least a few weeks? Replacing Giffords on the panel is an odd way to “preserve her voice.”
There may come a time when Democrats have to consider how to address Giffords’ committee assignments in the House, if her rehab looks like it will keep her away for a long period of time. Those decisions don’t have to be made two weeks into her recovery, though. In fact, given the role of the minority party in the House, it may not need to be an issue at all until the next election.
One unnamed Republican got in a dig at Sanchez’ sensitivity:
“From a woman who memorialized her cat, you’d think she’d show a little more compassion for a woman shot in the face,” said one GOP aide, referring to Sanchez’s 2010 Christmas card that paid tribute to her late cat, Gretzky.
Reyes and Adam Smith (D-CA) squelched Sanchez’ proposal.
Yeah, maybe so... but there's a time and place... and... oh, what the hell.. dems in a snit. Grab the popcorn!
giffords will never return....they need a rep...let’s not be stupid...
Yeah. During a recent presser with Giffords' docs, one reporter had to damn near drag out of one doc the fact she has paralysis on the right side.
Have you no sense of decency, Ms. Sanchez?
Darwinsm rules the democrat party. What next?
Realist my eye.
It sounds like she’s a scheming opportunist, as most socialists are. This is not the time to pull a cheap stunt like this. But this does illustrate that there is no depth a Democrat won’t sink to when it comes to grabbing power.
Guilty!
Bad analogy. This is the House of Representatives, where the majority rules and minorities get steamrolled. It matters not whether the Democrats actually replace the congresswoman since her vote will not likely be critical. This is especially true on the House Armed Services Committee.
Then why do any minority members bother with committee assignments at all or show up to committee meetings? Also, if that's the case then why would anyone care if someone subbed for her if it doesn't matter?
Sanchez is the person who defeated B-1 Bob Dornan with thousands of illegal votes.
She & her sister are each a real piece of work.
Aw, heck, here in the Bay Area, I've felt that way for about 10 years.
Sooner or later someone had to say it.
She does need to be replaced , I doubt she will ever be back.
The people of her congressional district should care. I was speaking from the viewpoint of the Dem House Leadership. Sanchez is making a huge PR mistake.
And that part I like. Just because it doesn't make sense to me doesn't mean I can't enjoy watching her squirm over the condemnation. Her tears are delicious.
She will have very similar symptoms and rehab requirements of a hemispherical stroke victim. Paralysis on her right side may be permanent.
Agree.
Apparently many on here have never known any stroke victims.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.